Go.CD vs Nemo.js

Overview

Nemo.js

Stacks3

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars8

Forks4

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

Go.CD vs Nemo.js: What are the differences?

Developers describe Go.CD as "Open source continuous delivery tool allows for advanced workflow modeling and dependencies management". GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. On the other hand, Nemo.js is detailed as "PayPal’s open source node.js automation framework". Nemo provides a simple way to add selenium automation to your NodeJS web projects. Provides plugin architecture to incorporate custom features to your tests.

Go.CD belongs to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack, while Nemo.js can be primarily classified under "Browser Testing".

Some of the features offered by Go.CD are:

Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution
Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages
Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance

On the other hand, Nemo.js provides the following key features:

Nemo.js wraps around the ubiquitous Selenium WebDriver, and as such, allows control of virtually any browser on any operating system
Built with a plugin architecture
Easy interface for authoring new plugins that can then be shared with others

Go.CD and Nemo.js are both open source tools. Go.CD with 5.02K GitHub stars and 791 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Nemo.js with 5 GitHub stars and 4 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Nemo.js, GoCD

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Nemo.js	GoCD
Nemo provides a simple way to add selenium automation to your NodeJS web projects. Provides plugin architecture to incorporate custom features to your tests.	GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.
Nemo.js wraps around the ubiquitous Selenium WebDriver, and as such, allows control of virtually any browser on any operating system;Built with a plugin architecture;Easy interface for authoring new plugins that can then be shared with others	Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8	GitHub Stars 7.3K
GitHub Forks 4	GitHub Forks 980
Stacks 3	Stacks 205
Followers 24	Followers 325
Votes 0	Votes 207
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support
Integrations
Selenium	Docker Kubernetes Slack

What are some alternatives to Nemo.js, GoCD?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Some of the features offered by Go.CD are:

Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution
Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages
Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance

On the other hand, Nemo.js provides the following key features:

Nemo.js wraps around the ubiquitous Selenium WebDriver, and as such, allows control of virtually any browser on any operating system
Built with a plugin architecture
Easy interface for authoring new plugins that can then be shared with others

Go.CD and Nemo.js are both open source tools. Go.CD with 5.02K GitHub stars and 791 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Nemo.js with 5 GitHub stars and 4 GitHub forks.

Go.CD vs Nemo.js