GoCD vs Strider

Overview

Strider

Stacks21

Followers38

Votes11

GitHub Stars4.6K

Forks426

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

GoCD vs Strider: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing GoCD and Strider, both are continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools that help streamline the development and deployment process. However, they differ in various aspects.

Architecture: GoCD uses a plugin-based architecture which allows users to extend and enhance its functionality with custom plugins. On the other hand, Strider is a self-hosted platform that does not support plugin integration, limiting its flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility.
Ease of Use: GoCD provides a web-based user interface that is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for teams to configure and manage their CI/CD pipelines. In contrast, Strider's user interface is considered to be less user-friendly and may require more time for new users to get acquainted with its interface and features.
Scalability: GoCD is known for its scalability, allowing users to easily scale their CI/CD infrastructure to meet the demands of large projects and diverse teams. Strider, on the other hand, may face limitations in scalability, especially when handling complex and large-scale projects.
Integration Capabilities: GoCD offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and SVN, as well as with various build tools and testing frameworks. Strider, while supporting some integrations, may lack the extensive integration capabilities provided by GoCD.
Community Support: GoCD has a strong community of users and developers who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums, documentation, and tutorials. In comparison, Strider's community may be relatively smaller, resulting in potentially slower responses to user queries and fewer resources for troubleshooting issues.
Deployment Flexibility: GoCD offers flexibility in deployment options, allowing users to deploy it on-premises or in the cloud based on their requirements and preferences. Strider, on the other hand, is primarily designed for self-hosted deployment, limiting users who prefer cloud-based deployment options.

In Summary, GoCD and Strider differ in terms of architecture, ease of use, scalability, integration capabilities, community support, and deployment flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Strider, GoCD

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Strider	GoCD
Strider is an Open Source Continuous Deployment / Continuous Integration platform. It is written in Node.JS / JavaScript and uses MongoDB as a backing store. It is published under the BSD license.	GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.
add hooks to perform arbitrary actions during build.;modify the database schema to add custom fields.;register their own HTTP routes.;subscribe to and emit socket events.;create or modify user interfaces within Strider.	Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.6K	GitHub Stars 7.3K
GitHub Forks 426	GitHub Forks 980
Stacks 21	Stacks 205
Followers 38	Followers 325
Votes 11	Votes 207
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Free Open Source 5 Hosted Internally	Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support
Integrations
No integrations available	Docker Kubernetes Slack

What are some alternatives to Strider, GoCD?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GoCD vs Strider: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: GoCD uses a plugin-based architecture which allows users to extend and enhance its functionality with custom plugins. On the other hand, Strider is a self-hosted platform that does not support plugin integration, limiting its flexibility in terms of customization and extensibility.
Ease of Use: GoCD provides a web-based user interface that is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for teams to configure and manage their CI/CD pipelines. In contrast, Strider's user interface is considered to be less user-friendly and may require more time for new users to get acquainted with its interface and features.
Scalability: GoCD is known for its scalability, allowing users to easily scale their CI/CD infrastructure to meet the demands of large projects and diverse teams. Strider, on the other hand, may face limitations in scalability, especially when handling complex and large-scale projects.
Integration Capabilities: GoCD offers seamless integration with popular version control systems like Git, Mercurial, and SVN, as well as with various build tools and testing frameworks. Strider, while supporting some integrations, may lack the extensive integration capabilities provided by GoCD.
Community Support: GoCD has a strong community of users and developers who actively contribute to its development and provide support through forums, documentation, and tutorials. In comparison, Strider's community may be relatively smaller, resulting in potentially slower responses to user queries and fewer resources for troubleshooting issues.
Deployment Flexibility: GoCD offers flexibility in deployment options, allowing users to deploy it on-premises or in the cloud based on their requirements and preferences. Strider, on the other hand, is primarily designed for self-hosted deployment, limiting users who prefer cloud-based deployment options.

In Summary, GoCD and Strider differ in terms of architecture, ease of use, scalability, integration capabilities, community support, and deployment flexibility.

GoCD vs Strider

Overview