StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Google App Engine vs PythonAnywhere

Google App Engine vs PythonAnywhere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere
Stacks90
Followers293
Votes64

Google App Engine vs PythonAnywhere: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google App Engine and PythonAnywhere are two platforms that offer hosting and deployment services for web applications. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Pricing Model: Google App Engine has a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on resource consumption, while PythonAnywhere offers fixed-price plans based on the amount of storage and computational power required. This difference in pricing models allows users to choose the option that best suits their budget and usage patterns.

  2. Scalability and Flexibility: Google App Engine is designed to handle high-traffic applications and provides automatic scaling to accommodate fluctuating user demands. It offers various runtime environments and supports multiple programming languages beyond Python. On the other hand, PythonAnywhere is more focused on simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for smaller projects with lower traffic. It primarily supports Python and offers limited scalability options.

  3. Deployment Process: Google App Engine provides a managed infrastructure where developers can deploy their applications directly from the command line or through integration with development tools like Git. It also offers features like traffic splitting and versioning for smooth deployment of updates. In contrast, PythonAnywhere offers a simple web-based deployment interface, making it easier for beginners to get started. However, it may lack some advanced deployment features provided by Google App Engine.

  4. Additional Services and Integration: Google App Engine offers a wide range of additional services and integrations with other Google Cloud Platform products, such as BigQuery for analytics, Firestore for database storage, and Cloud Pub/Sub for messaging. These services provide developers with a comprehensive ecosystem for building and scaling applications. PythonAnywhere, being a more dedicated hosting platform, does not offer such extensive integrations and additional services.

  5. Support and Community: Google App Engine benefits from the extensive support and active community of the Google Cloud Platform. It has comprehensive documentation, forums, and support channels for developers to seek assistance. PythonAnywhere, being a smaller and more specialized platform, may have a smaller support community and documentation. However, it still provides customer support and assistance for its users.

  6. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: PythonAnywhere emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, making it suitable for beginners and developers who prefer a straightforward hosting experience. It provides a user-friendly web interface and simple deployment process. Google App Engine, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and flexibility. It is more suitable for developers with experience in cloud environments or those who require advanced scalability and integration options.

In summary, Google App Engine is a more robust and flexible platform with a scalable infrastructure, extensive services, and integration options, while PythonAnywhere provides a simpler and beginner-friendly hosting experience with fixed-price plans. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs, budget, and expertise of the developers or businesses.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
PythonAnywhere
PythonAnywhere

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
-
Statistics
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
90
Followers
8.1K
Followers
293
Votes
611
Votes
64
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Pros
  • 15
    Web apps
  • 11
    Easy Setup
  • 8
    Free plan
  • 8
    Great support
  • 8
    Shell access
Cons
  • 1
    No root access
  • 1
    Really small community
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, PythonAnywhere?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

CapRover

CapRover

It is an extremely easy to use app/database deployment & web server manager for your NodeJS, Python, PHP, ASP.NET, Ruby, MySQL, MongoDB, Postgres, WordPress (and etc...) applications! It's blazingly fast and very robust as it uses Docker, nginx, LetsEncrypt and NetData under the hood behind its simple-to-use interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase