Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google BigQuery vs Oracle: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will explore and compare the key differences between Google BigQuery and Oracle for data processing and analysis. Both BigQuery and Oracle are powerful database management systems, but they have distinct features and capabilities that set them apart.
Scalability: One major difference between Google BigQuery and Oracle is their scalability. BigQuery is built on Google's cloud infrastructure, which makes it highly scalable, allowing it to handle massive datasets and process large-scale queries efficiently. On the other hand, Oracle's scalability is limited by the hardware resources of the underlying infrastructure it is deployed on.
Storage System: Another key difference lies in their storage systems. BigQuery uses a columnar storage engine that is optimized for analytical workloads, enabling faster query performance on vast quantities of data. In contrast, Oracle uses a row-based storage engine, which is more suitable for transactional workloads that involve frequent updates and inserts.
Pricing Model: The pricing models of BigQuery and Oracle also differ significantly. BigQuery follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the amount of data processed and the queries performed. Oracle, on the other hand, typically follows a traditional licensing model, where users pay for the licenses based on their usage requirements and the number of server instances deployed.
Managed Service: Google BigQuery is a fully managed service, which means that Google handles the management of the underlying infrastructure, including backups, maintenance, and security. This relieves the users from the burden of infrastructure management and allows them to focus solely on data analysis. In contrast, Oracle provides both cloud-based and on-premises solutions, which give users more control over their infrastructure but also require them to handle the management tasks themselves.
Data Integration and Ecosystem: Google BigQuery integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services, such as Google Cloud Storage, Google Analytics, and Google Sheets, allowing users to easily import, export, and analyze data from these sources. Oracle, on the other hand, has a broader ecosystem of products and services that can be integrated with its database, including Oracle Analytics, Oracle Data Integrator, and Oracle Data Visualization.
Query Language: Lastly, the query languages used by BigQuery and Oracle are different. BigQuery uses a variant of SQL called Standard SQL, which is compatible with the ANSI SQL standard and offers advanced analytical functions. Oracle, on the other hand, uses its own dialect of SQL called Oracle SQL, which includes proprietary features and extensions specific to Oracle's database engine.
In summary, Google BigQuery and Oracle differ in terms of scalability, storage system, pricing model, managed service, data integration, and query language. Each of these differences makes them suitable for different use cases and environments.
We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL-as-a-Service that the users can deploy in any Cloud without concerns from our website at some standard cost. With Oracle Database, developers would have to worry about what they implement and the related costs of each feature but the licensing model from Tibero is just 1 price and we have all features included, so we don't have to worry and developers using our SQLaaS neither. PostgreSQL would be open source. We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL that you can deploy in any Cloud without concerns. PostgreSQL would be the open source option but we need to offer an SQLaaS with encryption and more enterprise features in the background and best value option we have found, it was Tibero Database for PL/SQL-based applications.
We wanted a JSON datastore that could save the state of our bioinformatics visualizations without destructive normalization. As a leading NoSQL data storage technology, MongoDB has been a perfect fit for our needs. Plus it's open source, and has an enterprise SLA scale-out path, with support of hosted solutions like Atlas. Mongo has been an absolute champ. So much so that SQL and Oracle have begun shipping JSON column types as a new feature for their databases. And when Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) announced support for JSON, we basically had our FHIR datalake technology.
In the field of bioinformatics, we regularly work with hierarchical and unstructured document data. Unstructured text data from PDFs, image data from radiographs, phylogenetic trees and cladograms, network graphs, streaming ECG data... none of it fits into a traditional SQL database particularly well. As such, we prefer to use document oriented databases.
MongoDB is probably the oldest component in our stack besides Javascript, having been in it for over 5 years. At the time, we were looking for a technology that could simply cache our data visualization state (stored in JSON) in a database as-is without any destructive normalization. MongoDB was the perfect tool; and has been exceeding expectations ever since.
Trivia fact: some of the earliest electronic medical records (EMRs) used a document oriented database called MUMPS as early as the 1960s, prior to the invention of SQL. MUMPS is still in use today in systems like Epic and VistA, and stores upwards of 40% of all medical records at hospitals. So, we saw MongoDB as something as a 21st century version of the MUMPS database.
Pros of Google BigQuery
- High Performance28
- Easy to use25
- Fully managed service22
- Cheap Pricing19
- Process hundreds of GB in seconds16
- Big Data12
- Full table scans in seconds, no indexes needed11
- Always on, no per-hour costs8
- Good combination with fluentd6
- Machine learning4
- Easy to manage1
- Easy to learn0
Pros of Oracle
- Reliable44
- Enterprise33
- High Availability15
- Hard to maintain5
- Expensive5
- Maintainable4
- Hard to use4
- High complexity3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Google BigQuery
- You can't unit test changes in BQ data1
- Sdas0
Cons of Oracle
- Expensive14