Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Google Cloud Bigtable vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare the key differences between Google Cloud Bigtable and Google Cloud Storage. Both services are part of Google Cloud Platform and provide different capabilities for storing and accessing data.
Scalability and Data Model: Google Cloud Bigtable is a NoSQL, wide-column database that can handle large amounts of data and scale horizontally. It is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for applications that require fast data access. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage is an object storage service that allows you to store and retrieve any amount of data. It provides a simpler data model compared to Bigtable, making it suitable for storing files and large objects.
Structure and Querying: Bigtable is a key-value store that organizes data into tables composed of rows and columns. It does not support SQL-like querying out of the box but provides a wide range of client libraries for data manipulation. On the other hand, Cloud Storage does not offer a traditional structured data model but provides powerful querying capabilities through its integration with Google Cloud Platform's BigQuery service. BigQuery allows you to run complex SQL queries on data stored in Cloud Storage.
Storage Cost: Bigtable's pricing is based on a combination of storage size and operations performed on the data, such as reads and writes. It offers a more granular pricing model but can be more expensive for high-traffic workloads. Cloud Storage, on the other hand, offers a more affordable storage cost compared to Bigtable and it is billed based on the amount of data stored without any additional charges for operations.
Data Durability and Availability: Both Bigtable and Cloud Storage offer durability by storing data redundantly within a region or across multiple regions. However, Bigtable provides higher availability and lower latency compared to Cloud Storage, making it a better choice for applications that require real-time data access.
Data Access Control: Bigtable offers fine-grained access control through Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles. You can define custom roles and assign them to specific users or service accounts, allowing you to control who can read or modify the data in Bigtable. Cloud Storage also provides access control mechanisms through IAM, but it offers additional options such as bucket policies and signed URLs for granting access to specific objects.
Data Transfer and Integration: Bigtable integrates well with other Google Cloud Platform services, such as Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery, allowing you to ingest, process, and analyze data seamlessly. Cloud Storage also provides integration with these services but offers broader compatibility with external systems through its RESTful APIs.
In Summary, Google Cloud Bigtable is a scalable NoSQL database with a wide-column data model, while Google Cloud Storage is an object storage service for storing and retrieving files and large objects. Bigtable offers high throughput and low latency, custom access control, and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services. Cloud Storage provides simpler storage, powerful querying capabilities through BigQuery, more affordable storage costs, and broader compatibility with external systems.
We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.
We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.
Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Google Cloud Bigtable
- High performance11
- Fully managed9
- High scalability5
Pros of Google Cloud Storage
- Scalable28
- Cheap19
- Reliable14
- Easy9
- Chealp3
- More praticlal and easy2