StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Google Cloud Bigtable vs Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Bigtable vs Google Cloud Storage

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes75
Google Cloud Bigtable
Google Cloud Bigtable
Stacks173
Followers363
Votes25

Google Cloud Bigtable vs Google Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between Google Cloud Bigtable and Google Cloud Storage. Both services are part of Google Cloud Platform and provide different capabilities for storing and accessing data.

  1. Scalability and Data Model: Google Cloud Bigtable is a NoSQL, wide-column database that can handle large amounts of data and scale horizontally. It is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for applications that require fast data access. On the other hand, Google Cloud Storage is an object storage service that allows you to store and retrieve any amount of data. It provides a simpler data model compared to Bigtable, making it suitable for storing files and large objects.

  2. Structure and Querying: Bigtable is a key-value store that organizes data into tables composed of rows and columns. It does not support SQL-like querying out of the box but provides a wide range of client libraries for data manipulation. On the other hand, Cloud Storage does not offer a traditional structured data model but provides powerful querying capabilities through its integration with Google Cloud Platform's BigQuery service. BigQuery allows you to run complex SQL queries on data stored in Cloud Storage.

  3. Storage Cost: Bigtable's pricing is based on a combination of storage size and operations performed on the data, such as reads and writes. It offers a more granular pricing model but can be more expensive for high-traffic workloads. Cloud Storage, on the other hand, offers a more affordable storage cost compared to Bigtable and it is billed based on the amount of data stored without any additional charges for operations.

  4. Data Durability and Availability: Both Bigtable and Cloud Storage offer durability by storing data redundantly within a region or across multiple regions. However, Bigtable provides higher availability and lower latency compared to Cloud Storage, making it a better choice for applications that require real-time data access.

  5. Data Access Control: Bigtable offers fine-grained access control through Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles. You can define custom roles and assign them to specific users or service accounts, allowing you to control who can read or modify the data in Bigtable. Cloud Storage also provides access control mechanisms through IAM, but it offers additional options such as bucket policies and signed URLs for granting access to specific objects.

  6. Data Transfer and Integration: Bigtable integrates well with other Google Cloud Platform services, such as Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery, allowing you to ingest, process, and analyze data seamlessly. Cloud Storage also provides integration with these services but offers broader compatibility with external systems through its RESTful APIs.

In Summary, Google Cloud Bigtable is a scalable NoSQL database with a wide-column data model, while Google Cloud Storage is an object storage service for storing and retrieving files and large objects. Bigtable offers high throughput and low latency, custom access control, and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services. Cloud Storage provides simpler storage, powerful querying capabilities through BigQuery, more affordable storage costs, and broader compatibility with external systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud Bigtable

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Bigtable
Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing
Unmatched Performance: Single-digit millisecond latency and over 2X the performance per dollar of unmanaged NoSQL alternatives.;Open Source Interface: Because Cloud Bigtable is accessed through the HBase API, it is natively integrated with much of the existing big data and Hadoop ecosystem and supports Google’s big data products. Additionally, data can be imported from or exported to existing HBase clusters through simple bulk ingestion tools using industry-standard formats.;Low Cost: By providing a fully managed service and exceptional efficiency, Cloud Bigtable’s total cost of ownership is less than half the cost of its direct competition.;Security: Cloud Bigtable is built with a replicated storage strategy, and all data is encrypted both in-flight and at rest.;Simplicity: Creating or reconfiguring a Cloud Bigtable cluster is done through a simple user interface and can be completed in less than 10 seconds. As data is put into Cloud Bigtable the backing storage scales automatically, so there’s no need to do complicated estimates of capacity requirements.;Maturity: Over the past 10+ years, Bigtable has driven Google’s most critical applications. In addition, the HBase API is a industry-standard interface for combined operational and analytical workloads.
Statistics
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
173
Followers
1.2K
Followers
363
Votes
75
Votes
25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 19
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
Pros
  • 11
    High performance
  • 9
    Fully managed
  • 5
    High scalability
Integrations
No integrations available
Heroic
Heroic
Hadoop
Hadoop
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, Google Cloud Bigtable?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Cloudant

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase