StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. Google Cloud Build vs Harness.io

Google Cloud Build vs Harness.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
Stacks807
Followers207
Votes4
Harness.io
Harness.io
Stacks58
Followers120
Votes6

Google Cloud Build vs Harness.io: What are the differences?

<Google Cloud Build and Harness.io are both popular CI/CD tools used in software development projects.

  1. Integration: Google Cloud Build is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services, allowing seamless deployment of applications within GCP infrastructure. On the other hand, Harness.io provides integration with a wide range of cloud providers and tools, offering flexibility in deployment options beyond GCP.
  2. Pipeline Orchestration: Google Cloud Build focuses on simplicity and scalability, providing basic pipeline orchestration capabilities for continuous integration and delivery. In contrast, Harness.io offers advanced pipeline orchestration features, including visual workflows, automated testing, and deployment strategies to streamline the entire development process.
  3. Deployment Automation: Google Cloud Build primarily focuses on building and testing code, with limited support for advanced deployment automation features. Harness.io, on the other hand, specializes in automated deployments, providing robust rollout strategies, canary deployments, and advanced monitoring capabilities to ensure smooth application delivery.
  4. Enterprise Features: Google Cloud Build offers a cost-effective solution for smaller teams and startups, with basic features for CI/CD workflows. In comparison, Harness.io caters to enterprise customers, offering advanced security, compliance, and governance features to meet the needs of large-scale deployment environments.
  5. Community Support: Google Cloud Build benefits from Google's extensive community and documentation support, providing resources for developers to troubleshoot issues and optimize their CI/CD workflows. Harness.io also has a strong community following, with user forums, webinars, and support channels to assist users in implementing and utilizing the platform effectively.

In Summary, Google Cloud Build is more tightly integrated with Google Cloud Platform, offers simpler pipeline orchestration, and is suited for smaller teams, while Harness.io provides advanced deployment automation, enterprise features, and comprehensive community support for larger organizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
Harness.io
Harness.io

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Commit to deploy in minutes; Choose what to build; Extremely fast builds; Automate your deployments; Define your custom workflow; Unparalleled privacy; Native Docker support; Generous free tier; Powerful insights; Identify vulnerabilities; Build locally or in the cloud
ML-based Continuous Verification; Continuous Insights; Continuous Security; Advanced Deployment Strategies; Cloud & Container Cost Visibility; Cloud Cost Event Correlation; Detailed cost analysis without manual tagging
Statistics
Stacks
807
Stacks
58
Followers
207
Followers
120
Votes
4
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Container based
  • 2
    GCP easy integration
Cons
  • 2
    Vendor lock-in
Pros
  • 1
    HIO monitor application health and help resolve issues
  • 1
    GitOps capability
  • 1
    Feature Flags
  • 1
    Autostopping rules for Kubernetes clusters
  • 1
    Test Intelligence
Cons
  • 1
    Cost grows quickly
Integrations
No integrations available
New Relic
New Relic
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Splunk
Splunk
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Build, Harness.io?

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

AWS CodePipeline

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Kraken Deploy

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

DeployHQ

DeployHQ

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

Gaia

Gaia

Gaia is an open source automation platform which makes it easy and fun to build powerful pipelines in any programming language. Based on HashiCorp's go-plugin and gRPC, gaia is efficient, fast, lightweight, and developer friendly.

Weaveworks Flux

Weaveworks Flux

It is the operator that makes GitOps happen in your cluster. It ensures that the cluster config matches the one in git and automates your deployments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana