Google Cloud Build vs HashiCorp Waypoint

Overview

Google Cloud Build

Stacks808

Followers207

Votes4

HashiCorp Waypoint

Stacks18

Followers31

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.7K

Forks331

Google Cloud Build vs HashiCorp Waypoint: What are the differences?

Deployment Strategy: Google Cloud Build automates the process of building, testing, and deploying applications across various environments using a managed service, whereas HashiCorp Waypoint focuses on providing a platform-agnostic workflow to deploy applications to any target environment consistently.
Integration with tools: Google Cloud Build seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services like Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and Cloud Functions, offering a robust ecosystem for deployment, while HashiCorp Waypoint integrates with multiple cloud providers, container registries, orchestrators, and CI/CD pipelines, providing flexibility in choosing tools and services.
Multi-Cloud Support: HashiCorp Waypoint supports deploying applications to multiple cloud providers or on-premises environments without vendor lock-in, enabling users to have the flexibility to choose their deployment targets, whereas Google Cloud Build is more optimized for deployment within the Google Cloud Platform ecosystem.
Developer Experience: Google Cloud Build provides a simplified and streamlined user interface for setting up and monitoring build workflows through the Google Cloud Console, making it easier for developers to manage their deployment pipelines, whereas HashiCorp Waypoint emphasizes a developer-first approach by focusing on creating a consistent and user-friendly experience for defining and executing deployments.
Architecture: Google Cloud Build is a fully managed service that abstracts away infrastructure concerns such as scaling and maintenance, allowing users to focus on building and deploying applications, while HashiCorp Waypoint can be self-hosted or run in a managed server mode, giving users more control over the deployment platform and architecture.

In Summary, Google Cloud Build and HashiCorp Waypoint offer different approaches to application deployment, with Google Cloud Build being tightly integrated with Google Cloud services and offering a managed deployment solution, while HashiCorp Waypoint provides a platform-agnostic workflow with support for multi-cloud deployments and a strong emphasis on developer experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Build	HashiCorp Waypoint
Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.	It provides a modern workflow to build, deploy, and release across platforms. It uses a single configuration file and common workflow to manage and observe deployments across platforms such as Kubernetes, Nomad, EC2, Google Cloud Run, and more.
Commit to deploy in minutes; Choose what to build; Extremely fast builds; Automate your deployments; Define your custom workflow; Unparalleled privacy; Native Docker support; Generous free tier; Powerful insights; Identify vulnerabilities; Build locally or in the cloud	View log output for running applications and deployments; Execute a command in the context of a running application; Get publicly accessible preview URLs per-deployment; View projects and applications being deployed by Waypoint in a web interface; Integrate with existing CI/CD providers and version control providers like GitHub, CircleCI, Jenkins, GitLab, and more; Easily extend Waypoint with custom support for platforms, build processes, and release systems
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 331
Stacks 808	Stacks 18
Followers 207	Followers 31
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Container based 2 GCP easy integration Cons 2 Vendor lock-in	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	GitLab Docker GitHub Kubernetes Amazon EC2 Nomad CircleCI Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Build, HashiCorp Waypoint?

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

AWS CodePipeline

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

DeployHQ

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

Related Comparisons

Google Cloud Build vs HashiCorp Waypoint: What are the differences?

Deployment Strategy: Google Cloud Build automates the process of building, testing, and deploying applications across various environments using a managed service, whereas HashiCorp Waypoint focuses on providing a platform-agnostic workflow to deploy applications to any target environment consistently.
Integration with tools: Google Cloud Build seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services like Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) and Cloud Functions, offering a robust ecosystem for deployment, while HashiCorp Waypoint integrates with multiple cloud providers, container registries, orchestrators, and CI/CD pipelines, providing flexibility in choosing tools and services.
Multi-Cloud Support: HashiCorp Waypoint supports deploying applications to multiple cloud providers or on-premises environments without vendor lock-in, enabling users to have the flexibility to choose their deployment targets, whereas Google Cloud Build is more optimized for deployment within the Google Cloud Platform ecosystem.
Developer Experience: Google Cloud Build provides a simplified and streamlined user interface for setting up and monitoring build workflows through the Google Cloud Console, making it easier for developers to manage their deployment pipelines, whereas HashiCorp Waypoint emphasizes a developer-first approach by focusing on creating a consistent and user-friendly experience for defining and executing deployments.
Architecture: Google Cloud Build is a fully managed service that abstracts away infrastructure concerns such as scaling and maintenance, allowing users to focus on building and deploying applications, while HashiCorp Waypoint can be self-hosted or run in a managed server mode, giving users more control over the deployment platform and architecture.

Google Cloud Build vs HashiCorp Waypoint

Overview