StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Google Cloud Container Builder vs Testcontainers

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Testcontainers

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
Stacks177
Followers198
Votes0
Testcontainers
Testcontainers
Stacks139
Followers59
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.5K
Forks1.8K

Google Cloud Container Builder vs Testcontainers: What are the differences?

# Google Cloud Container Builder vs Testcontainers

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Architecture**: Google Cloud Container Builder is a cloud-based service that builds containers directly from source code stored in a repository, while Testcontainers is a Java library that allows for running Docker containers during unit testing.
2. **Purpose**: Google Cloud Container Builder is primarily used for building container images for deployment in the cloud, whereas Testcontainers is designed for running integration tests that require external services or dependencies.
3. **Scalability**: Google Cloud Container Builder is managed by Google and can handle large-scale container image builds, while Testcontainers is typically used for smaller-scale testing scenarios.
4. **Platform Compatibility**: Google Cloud Container Builder is specifically designed for Google Cloud Platform and integrates seamlessly with other GCP services, whereas Testcontainers can be used in any Java application regardless of the cloud platform being used.
5. **Customization**: Google Cloud Container Builder provides a set of pre-defined build steps and configurations, making it easy to use for beginners, whereas Testcontainers allows users to customize and define their own Docker containers for testing purposes.
6. **Cost**: Google Cloud Container Builder pricing is based on the resources consumed during builds, while Testcontainers is a free and open-source library that can be used without any additional costs.

In Summary, Google Cloud Container Builder and Testcontainers differ in architecture, purpose, scalability, platform compatibility, customization, and cost. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Container Builder
Google Cloud Container Builder
Testcontainers
Testcontainers

Run your container image builds in a fast, consistent, and reliable environment on Google Cloud Platform. Build in any language and package your build artifacts into Docker containers for deployment.

It is a Java library that supports JUnit tests, providing lightweight, throwaway instances of common databases, Selenium web browsers, or anything else that can run in a Docker container.

-
Data access layer integration tests; Application integration tests; UI/Acceptance tests
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
177
Stacks
139
Followers
198
Followers
59
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Oracle
Oracle
Docker
Docker
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
Spock Framework
Spock Framework
JUnit
JUnit

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Container Builder, Testcontainers?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana