Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Datastore: What are the differences?
Introduction
Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore are both NoSQL databases that offer scalability, flexibility, and high-performance storage solutions. However, there are key differences between the two that make each service unique. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.
Data Model: One of the key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore is their underlying data model. DynamoDB uses a key-value store model, where each item is uniquely identified by its primary key. Datastore, on the other hand, uses an entity model, similar to a relational database, where data is structured into entities with properties and relationships.
Consistency Model: DynamoDB provides eventual consistency by default, meaning that it allows for some delay in the propagation of updates across all replicas. However, it also offers strong consistency as an option. In contrast, Datastore guarantees strong consistency for all reads and writes, ensuring that all replicas are always up to date.
Scalability: DynamoDB is designed to scale horizontally, allowing you to add more read and write capacity as your application needs grow. It automatically handles the distribution of data across multiple servers. Datastore, on the other hand, scales vertically, meaning that you can increase the storage capacity and performance of an individual entity as needed.
Query Capabilities: DynamoDB provides a flexible query language called DynamoDB Query, which allows you to retrieve data based on conditions and filters. Datastore, on the other hand, offers a powerful query language called GQL (Google Query Language) that supports complex queries with filtering, sorting, and projection.
Secondary Indexes: DynamoDB supports global secondary indexes, which allow you to create additional indexes on non-key attributes for efficient querying. Datastore, on the other hand, supports automatic indexing on all properties of an entity, making it easier to query data without the need for explicit indexing.
Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of DynamoDB is based on provisioned throughput, storage, and data transfer. You pay for the read and write capacity units that you provision. Datastore, on the other hand, has a pricing structure based on the number of entities, entity reads/writes, and storage usage. You pay for the number of entities you store and the operations you perform on them.
In summary, Amazon DynamoDB and Google Cloud Datastore differ in their data models, consistency models, scalability approaches, query capabilities, secondary index support, and pricing structures. The choice between the two depends on your specific requirements and the nature of your application.
We are building a social media app, where users will post images, like their post, and make friends based on their interest. We are currently using Cloud Firestore and Firebase Realtime Database. We are looking for another database like Amazon DynamoDB; how much this decision can be efficient in terms of pricing and overhead?
Hi, Akash,
I wouldn't make this decision without lots more information. Cloud Firestore has a much richer metamodel (document-oriented) than Dynamo (key-value), and Dynamo seems to be particularly restrictive. That is why it is so fast. There are many needs in most applications to get lightning access to the members of a set, one set at a time. Dynamo DB is a great choice. But, social media applications generally need to be able to make long traverses across a graph. While you can make almost any metamodel act like another one, with your own custom layers on top of it, or just by writing a lot more code, it's a long way around to do that with simple key-value sets. It's hard enough to traverse across networks of collections in a document-oriented database. So, if you are moving, I think a graph-oriented database like Amazon Neptune, or, if you might want built-in reasoning, Allegro or Ontotext, would take the least programming, which is where the most cost and bugs can be avoided. Also, managed systems are also less costly in terms of people's time and system errors. It's easier to measure the costs of managed systems, so they are often seen as more costly.
CouchDB has proven us to be a reliable multi-master NoSQL JSON database built natively for the web.
We decided to use it over alternatives such as Firebase due topology, costs and frontend architecture.
Thanks to CouchDB we are now a frontend first CRM platform. We are capable of delivering and leveraging our frontend code to build most of our new functionalities directly within the frontend which we enrich through backend sidecars connected to each Parrot and each CouchDB.
Pros of Amazon DynamoDB
- Predictable performance and cost62
- Scalable56
- Native JSON Support35
- AWS Free Tier21
- Fast7
- No sql3
- To store data3
- Serverless2
- No Stored procedures is GOOD2
- ORM with DynamoDBMapper1
- Elastic Scalability using on-demand mode1
- Elastic Scalability using autoscaling1
- DynamoDB Stream1
Pros of Google Cloud Datastore
- High scalability7
- Serverless2
- Ability to query any property2
- Pay for what you use1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon DynamoDB
- Only sequential access for paginate data4
- Scaling1
- Document Limit Size1