StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Google Cloud Run vs LeanCloud

Google Cloud Run vs LeanCloud

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LeanCloud
LeanCloud
Stacks12
Followers7
Votes0
Google Cloud Run
Google Cloud Run
Stacks290
Followers243
Votes62

Google Cloud Run vs LeanCloud: What are the differences?

Introduction: Google Cloud Run and LeanCloud are two popular platforms that offer serverless computing solutions, but they have key differences that make them unique in their own way.

1. Scalability: One key difference between Google Cloud Run and LeanCloud is in scalability. Google Cloud Run offers automatic scaling based on the load, ensuring that your application can handle sudden spikes in traffic efficiently. On the other hand, LeanCloud provides manual scaling options, where users can adjust the number of instances based on their requirements.

2. Pricing Model: Another significant difference lies in the pricing models of Google Cloud Run and LeanCloud. Google Cloud Run follows a pay-per-use model, where users only pay for the resources consumed by their applications. In contrast, LeanCloud offers tiered pricing plans, allowing users to choose a plan based on their expected usage and requirements.

3. Ecosystem Integration: Google Cloud Run provides seamless integration with other Google Cloud Platform services, enabling users to leverage a wide range of functionalities within a unified ecosystem. Meanwhile, LeanCloud focuses on providing a comprehensive backend solution for developers, offering features like cloud storage, databases, and push notifications as part of its core offerings.

4. Programming Language Support: When it comes to programming language support, Google Cloud Run supports a wider range of languages including Python, Node.js, and Go, making it suitable for developers with diverse language preferences. On the other hand, LeanCloud primarily focuses on supporting JavaScript and TypeScript, which might be a limiting factor for developers working with other languages.

5. Deployment Flexibility: Google Cloud Run offers flexible deployment options, allowing users to deploy containerized applications from various sources like Dockerfiles or container images. In contrast, LeanCloud provides a more streamlined deployment process tailored to its platform, which might be preferred by users looking for simplicity and ease of use.

6. Monitoring and Analytics: When it comes to monitoring and analytics, Google Cloud Run offers robust tools for tracking and analyzing application performance, ensuring that users can monitor their applications effectively. In comparison, LeanCloud provides basic monitoring capabilities, which may not be as comprehensive as the offerings from Google Cloud Run.

In Summary, Google Cloud Run and LeanCloud differ in scalability, pricing models, ecosystem integration, programming language support, deployment flexibility, and monitoring capabilities, offering unique strengths for users based on their requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on LeanCloud, Google Cloud Run

Clifford
Clifford

Software Engineer at Bidvest Advisory Services

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

Run cloud service containers instead of cloud-native services

  • Running containers means that your microservices are not "cooked" into a cloud provider's architecture.
  • Moving from one cloud to the next means that you simply spin up new instances of your containers in the new cloud using that cloud's container service.
  • Start redirecting your traffic to the new resources.
  • Turn off the containers in the cloud you migrated from.
71.3k views71.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

LeanCloud
LeanCloud
Google Cloud Run
Google Cloud Run

It is a complete and mature solution for both the stateless and stateful components of your backend.

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Multi-node coverage; Cross-region access acceleration; Flexible pricing; Easy Deployment options
Simple developer experience; Fast autoscaling; Managed; Any language, any library, any binary; Leverage container workflows and standards; Redundancy; Integrated logging and monitoring; Built on Knative; Custom domains
Statistics
Stacks
12
Stacks
290
Followers
7
Followers
243
Votes
0
Votes
62
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 11
    HTTPS endpoints
  • 10
    Pay per use
  • 10
    Fully managed
  • 7
    Concurrency: multiple requests sent to each container
  • 7
    Serverless
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Objective-C
Objective-C
Swift
Swift
Node.js
Node.js
Java
Java
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Cloud Build
Google Cloud Build
Docker
Docker
Knative
Knative

What are some alternatives to LeanCloud, Google Cloud Run?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase