Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GraphicsMagick

24
64
+ 1
4
ImageMagick

82
92
+ 1
0
Add tool

GraphicsMagick vs ImageMagick: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code snippet, we will outline the key differences between GraphicsMagick and ImageMagick. Both GraphicsMagick and ImageMagick are powerful image processing libraries used for manipulating images in various formats. To provide a better understanding, let's dive into the key differences between these two libraries.

  1. Implementation Language: GraphicsMagick is implemented in C language, whereas ImageMagick is written in C++. This difference in implementation language can have implications on performance and platform compatibility.

  2. Memory Management: GraphicsMagick employs a more conservative approach to memory management, which makes it consume less memory compared to ImageMagick. On the other hand, ImageMagick utilizes a more aggressive memory management strategy, resulting in potentially faster processing speeds at the cost of increased memory usage.

  3. Command-Line Interface: GraphicsMagick and ImageMagick both offer command-line interfaces; however, ImageMagick provides a more extensive and comprehensive set of command-line options and features. ImageMagick's command-line interface is known for its flexibility and advanced functionalities.

  4. Supported Formats: While both libraries support a wide range of image formats, GraphicsMagick has a slightly broader support for obscure or specialized image formats compared to ImageMagick. GraphicsMagick's broader format support can be advantageous in scenarios where handling specific image formats is crucial.

  5. Library Size: GraphicsMagick tends to have a smaller library size compared to ImageMagick. This smaller footprint can be beneficial in memory-constrained environments or when minimizing the overall application size is a concern.

  6. Community and Documentation: ImageMagick has a larger and more active community, which leads to a more extensive pool of online resources, tutorials, and community support. GraphicsMagick, although it has a dedicated user base, may have comparatively fewer tutorials and documentation available.

In summary, the key differences between GraphicsMagick and ImageMagick include the implementation language, memory management approach, command-line interface capabilities, supported formats, library size, and community/documentation availability.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of GraphicsMagick
Pros of ImageMagick
  • 4
    Used by flickr and etsy
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is GraphicsMagick?

    GraphicsMagick is the swiss army knife of image processing. Comprised of 267K physical lines (according to David A. Wheeler's SLOCCount) of source code in the base package (or 1,225K including 3rd party libraries) it provides a robust and efficient collection of tools and libraries which support reading, writing, and manipulating an image in over 88 major formats including important formats like DPX, GIF, JPEG, JPEG-2000, PNG, PDF, PNM, and TIFF.

    What is ImageMagick?

    It is a free and open-source software suite for displaying, converting, and editing raster image and vector image files. It can read and write images in a variety of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC, TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use GraphicsMagick?
    What companies use ImageMagick?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with GraphicsMagick?
    What tools integrate with ImageMagick?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to GraphicsMagick and ImageMagick?
      OpenCV
      OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.
      Google Drive
      Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.
      CloudFlare
      Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.
      Dropbox
      Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.
      Amazon CloudFront
      Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.
      See all alternatives