StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. Grav vs Publii

Grav vs Publii

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Grav
Grav
Stacks114
Followers158
Votes16
GitHub Stars15.2K
Forks1.4K
Publii
Publii
Stacks17
Followers62
Votes3

Grav vs Publii: What are the differences?

  1. File Structure and Flexibility: Grav follows a flat file structure, allowing users to easily edit files directly. Publii, on the other hand, uses a structured folder system, providing a more organized approach to managing content and files. This difference in file structure can impact user experience based on preferences for file management.

  2. Themes and Templates: Grav offers a wide range of themes and templates that can be customized extensively using Twig templating. Publii, however, has a limited selection of themes available, and customization options are restricted to settings within the software. This difference in theme availability and customization capabilities can affect the design flexibility of websites created on each platform.

  3. User Interface and Ease of Use: Grav requires users to have some technical knowledge due to its reliance on Markdown and YAML files. Publii is designed with simplicity in mind, providing a user-friendly interface for content creation without the need for coding skills. This difference in user interface and ease of use can influence the learning curve and accessibility for users of varying technical backgrounds.

  4. Hosting and Server Requirements: Grav is self-hosted, allowing users to have full control over their website's hosting and server requirements. Publii, being a desktop-based CMS, does not require users to manage hosting or server configurations, providing a simpler setup process. This difference in hosting options can impact overall website performance and maintenance for users with different hosting preferences.

  5. Plugins and Extensions: Grav relies heavily on plugins and extensions for additional functionality, with a wide selection available for users to enhance their websites. Publii, on the other hand, has limited plugin support, offering only essential features built into the software. This difference in plugin availability can influence the scalability and customization options for websites built on each platform.

  6. Community Support and Documentation: Grav has a strong community of developers contributing to its documentation and support forums, offering extensive resources for troubleshooting and development. Publii, while growing, has a smaller community compared to Grav, potentially impacting the availability of resources and assistance for users. This difference in community support and documentation can play a role in the overall user experience and problem-solving capabilities for each platform.

In Summary, Grav and Publii differ in file structure, themes, user interface, hosting, plugins, and community support, impacting the customization options, ease of use, and user experience on each platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grav
Grav
Publii
Publii

It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors.

Free, Open-Source Static Website CMS for Windows and MacOS

Twig; YAML; Markdown; Flat-file; CLI
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
114
Stacks
17
Followers
158
Followers
62
Votes
16
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to Update
  • 3
    No Databases
  • 2
    Extensive Plugins
  • 2
    Fast Performance
  • 2
    Strong Security
Cons
  • 2
    Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)
Pros
  • 2
    Fast load pages
  • 1
    Easy to use
Integrations
NGINX
NGINX
Symfony
Symfony
PHP
PHP
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Netlify
Netlify

What are some alternatives to Grav, Publii?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack