Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Gravitee.io vs Kong: What are the differences?
Introduction
Gravitee.io and Kong are both popular API management platforms that provide solutions for designing, securing, and monitoring APIs. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that make each platform unique.
Architecture: Gravitee.io uses a modular and extensible architecture that allows users to customize and extend the platform according to their specific requirements. On the other hand, Kong follows a plugin-based architecture that enables users to add custom features and functionalities by leveraging plugins.
Community and Support: Gravitee.io has a smaller but highly active and supportive community that focuses on providing assistance and sharing knowledge with users. Kong, on the other hand, has a larger community and a dedicated support team, offering extensive documentation, forums, and professional services.
Ease of Use: Gravitee.io prioritizes simplicity and ease of use by providing a user-friendly interface and intuitive workflows. Kong, while also user-friendly, offers a more feature-rich environment with a steeper learning curve due to the number of advanced features it offers.
Open Source: Gravitee.io is fully open-source, which means users have complete access to the source code and can customize it to suit their needs. Kong, on the other hand, has both open-source and enterprise versions, with some advanced features and support available exclusively in the enterprise edition.
Analytics and Monitoring: Gravitee.io offers comprehensive API analytics and monitoring capabilities out of the box, allowing users to gain insights into API usage and performance. Kong, while also providing analytics, offers more advanced monitoring and visualization options through its plugins and integrations.
Integration Ecosystem: Gravitee.io provides a range of out-of-the-box integrations with popular third-party tools and services, making it easier to integrate with existing systems. Kong also offers various integrations but focuses more on integrations with the Kong ecosystem, which includes plugins, modules, and service mesh solutions.
In summary, Gravitee.io focuses on a modular architecture, ease of use, and extensibility, with a vibrant community. Kong offers a plugin-based architecture, a larger community, and a feature-rich environment with advanced monitoring capabilities and various integrations.
Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.
Pros of Gravitee.io
- Rich policy library1
- Easy deployment on OpenShoft1
- Paid service is available(beneficial in the time of p)1
- No Managed Service0
Pros of Kong
- Easy to maintain37
- Easy to install32
- Flexible26
- Great performance21
- Api blueprint7
- Custom Plugins4
- Kubernetes-native3
- Security2
- Has a good plugin infrastructure2
- Agnostic2
- Load balancing1
- Documentation is clear1
- Very customizable1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gravitee.io
- Not Cloud Ready1