Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Groovy vs OCaml: What are the differences?
Developers describe Groovy as "A dynamic language for the Java platform". Groovy builds upon the strengths of Java but has additional power features inspired by languages like Python, Ruby and Smalltalk. It makes modern programming features available to Java developers with almost-zero learning curve. On the other hand, OCaml is detailed as "A general purpose industrial-strength programming language". It is an industrial strength programming language supporting functional, imperative and object-oriented styles. It is the technology of choice in companies where a single mistake can cost millions and speed matters, .
Groovy and OCaml belong to "Languages" category of the tech stack.
Groovy is an open source tool with 1.49K GitHub stars and 415 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Groovy's open source repository on GitHub.
Starbucks, PedidosYa, and AgoraPulse are some of the popular companies that use Groovy, whereas OCaml is used by Hammer Lab, NG Informática, and Maersk Digital. Groovy has a broader approval, being mentioned in 104 company stacks & 346 developers stacks; compared to OCaml, which is listed in 6 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.
Pros of Groovy
- Java platform44
- Much more productive than java33
- Concise and readable29
- Very little code needed for complex tasks28
- Dynamic language22
- Nice dynamic syntax for the jvm13
- Very fast9
- Can work with JSON as an object7
- Easy to setup7
- Supports closures (lambdas)6
- Literal Collections6
- Syntactic sugar3
- Optional static typing3
- Developer Friendly2
Pros of OCaml
- Satisfying to write7
- Pattern matching6
- Also has OOP4
- Very practical4
- Easy syntax3
- Extremely powerful type inference3
- Efficient compiler1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Groovy
- Groovy Code can be slower than Java Code3
- Absurd syntax1
- Objects cause stateful/heap mess1
Cons of OCaml
- Small community3
- Royal pain in the neck to compile large programs1