Nameko vs gRPC

Overview

gRPC

Stacks2.4K

Followers1.4K

Votes64

GitHub Stars43.9K

Forks11.0K

Nameko

Stacks20

Followers79

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.8K

Forks468

Nameko vs gRPC: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a formatted comparison between Nameko and gRPC, highlighting the key differences between these two technologies.

Protocols: Nameko is a microservices framework that uses the AMQP protocol for communication between services. On the other hand, gRPC is a high-performance RPC (Remote Procedure Call) framework that uses the HTTP/2 protocol for communication. This difference in underlying protocols affects the implementation and communication patterns used by these technologies.
Serialization: Nameko uses pickle-based serialization, which offers flexibility but may introduce security risks if untrusted data is involved. In contrast, gRPC uses Protocol Buffers for serialization, which provides a compact and efficient binary format that can be easily versioned.
Service Discovery: Nameko provides its own built-in service discovery mechanism, allowing services to discover and communicate with each other using a registry. On the other hand, gRPC does not have a built-in service discovery mechanism, requiring external tools or libraries to handle service registration and discovery.
Language Support: Nameko is primarily designed for Python, offering a Python-specific API and development experience. On the other hand, gRPC supports multiple languages including Python, Java, C++, Go, and many more, making it a more versatile choice for cross-language communication.
Middleware and Extensibility: Nameko provides a middleware system that allows developers to add custom logic to the service chain, enabling features like authentication, logging, and error handling. Although gRPC also supports middleware-like features through interceptors, Nameko's middleware system provides more flexibility and control over the request/response flow.
Tooling and Ecosystem: Nameko has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to gRPC, which means there may be fewer libraries, tutorials, and resources available. gRPC, being a project backed by Google, has a larger community and ecosystem, offering extensive tooling, documentation, and community support.

In summary, Nameko and gRPC differ in the underlying protocols, serialization methods, service discovery mechanisms, language support, middleware and extensibility options, and the size of their respective ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on gRPC, Nameko

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

gRPC	Nameko
gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...	Python microservices framework that leverages AMQP for RPC. It supports asynchronous and synchronous events.
Simple service definition;Works across languages and platforms;Start quickly and scale;Works across languages and platforms;Bi-directional streaming and integrated auth	Focus on business logic; Distributed and scalable; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars 43.9K	GitHub Stars 4.8K
GitHub Forks 11.0K	GitHub Forks 468
Stacks 2.4K	Stacks 20
Followers 1.4K	Followers 79
Votes 64	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 25 Higth performance 15 The future of API 13 Easy setup 5 Contract-based 4 Polyglot	No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET Swift Java JavaScript C++ Kotlin	Django Slack Python Redis Sentry SQLAlchemy

What are some alternatives to gRPC, Nameko?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Nameko vs gRPC: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a formatted comparison between Nameko and gRPC, highlighting the key differences between these two technologies.

Protocols: Nameko is a microservices framework that uses the AMQP protocol for communication between services. On the other hand, gRPC is a high-performance RPC (Remote Procedure Call) framework that uses the HTTP/2 protocol for communication. This difference in underlying protocols affects the implementation and communication patterns used by these technologies.
Serialization: Nameko uses pickle-based serialization, which offers flexibility but may introduce security risks if untrusted data is involved. In contrast, gRPC uses Protocol Buffers for serialization, which provides a compact and efficient binary format that can be easily versioned.
Service Discovery: Nameko provides its own built-in service discovery mechanism, allowing services to discover and communicate with each other using a registry. On the other hand, gRPC does not have a built-in service discovery mechanism, requiring external tools or libraries to handle service registration and discovery.
Language Support: Nameko is primarily designed for Python, offering a Python-specific API and development experience. On the other hand, gRPC supports multiple languages including Python, Java, C++, Go, and many more, making it a more versatile choice for cross-language communication.
Middleware and Extensibility: Nameko provides a middleware system that allows developers to add custom logic to the service chain, enabling features like authentication, logging, and error handling. Although gRPC also supports middleware-like features through interceptors, Nameko's middleware system provides more flexibility and control over the request/response flow.
Tooling and Ecosystem: Nameko has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to gRPC, which means there may be fewer libraries, tutorials, and resources available. gRPC, being a project backed by Google, has a larger community and ecosystem, offering extensive tooling, documentation, and community support.

Nameko vs gRPC

Overview

Nameko vs gRPC: What are the differences?