GuardRails vs Snyk

Overview

Snyk

Stacks580

Followers380

Votes20

GuardRails

Stacks5

Followers11

Votes0

GuardRails vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GuardRails and Snyk

GuardRails and Snyk are both security scanning tools used for identifying vulnerabilities in codebases and providing developers with insights and recommendations for remediation. While they serve a similar purpose, there are some key differences between the two:

Integration Capability: GuardRails integrates seamlessly into popular code hosting platforms like GitHub and GitLab, making it easier for developers to incorporate security scanning into their existing workflows. On the other hand, Snyk offers integrations with different CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and CircleCI, allowing developers to include security checks as part of their continuous integration process.
Language Support: GuardRails supports a wide range of programming languages, including popular ones like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Java. This versatility allows developers using different languages to benefit from its security scanning capabilities. In contrast, Snyk primarily focuses on providing support for specific languages like JavaScript, Java, .NET, and Python, and may have limited support for other languages.
Developer-Centric Approach: GuardRails is designed with developers in mind and aims to deliver security insights and recommendations directly to the developer during the development process. It emphasizes real-time feedback and integration into existing tools, enabling developers to address vulnerabilities early on. Snyk, on the other hand, has a broader scope, offering security scanning and vulnerability management solutions to both developers and security teams.
Vulnerability Database: GuardRails leverages a comprehensive vulnerability database that includes vulnerability data from multiple sources, ensuring a wider coverage of potential security issues. It aggregates information from various vulnerability databases, such as the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) feeds. Snyk also maintains its own vulnerability database, which is regularly updated, but the specific sources it uses may vary.
Pricing Structure: GuardRails offers flexible pricing plans, including a free tier for open-source projects, making it accessible for developers and organizations of all sizes. Snyk, on the other hand, follows a tiered pricing structure based on factors such as the number of users, the size of code repositories, and additional features required. This may make GuardRails a more cost-effective option for smaller teams or individual developers.

In summary, GuardRails and Snyk differ in their integration capabilities, language support, developer-centric approach, the sources of their vulnerability databases, and pricing structures. These distinctions make each tool suitable for different use cases and user requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Snyk, GuardRails

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk	GuardRails
Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform	Makes open-source security tools easily available in your Pull Requests. Continuously identifies security problems in your codebase and helps you fix them.
-	Static Application Security Scanning, Software Composition Analysis, Hard-coded Secrets Detection, One-Click GitHub integration, Dashboard, Slack Integration
Statistics
Stacks 580	Stacks 5
Followers 380	Followers 11
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 False positives 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring 1 No malware detection	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java	Ruby Golang Node.js GitHub Python PHP

What are some alternatives to Snyk, GuardRails?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GuardRails vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GuardRails and Snyk

Integration Capability: GuardRails integrates seamlessly into popular code hosting platforms like GitHub and GitLab, making it easier for developers to incorporate security scanning into their existing workflows. On the other hand, Snyk offers integrations with different CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and CircleCI, allowing developers to include security checks as part of their continuous integration process.
Language Support: GuardRails supports a wide range of programming languages, including popular ones like JavaScript, Python, Ruby, and Java. This versatility allows developers using different languages to benefit from its security scanning capabilities. In contrast, Snyk primarily focuses on providing support for specific languages like JavaScript, Java, .NET, and Python, and may have limited support for other languages.
Developer-Centric Approach: GuardRails is designed with developers in mind and aims to deliver security insights and recommendations directly to the developer during the development process. It emphasizes real-time feedback and integration into existing tools, enabling developers to address vulnerabilities early on. Snyk, on the other hand, has a broader scope, offering security scanning and vulnerability management solutions to both developers and security teams.
Vulnerability Database: GuardRails leverages a comprehensive vulnerability database that includes vulnerability data from multiple sources, ensuring a wider coverage of potential security issues. It aggregates information from various vulnerability databases, such as the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) feeds. Snyk also maintains its own vulnerability database, which is regularly updated, but the specific sources it uses may vary.
Pricing Structure: GuardRails offers flexible pricing plans, including a free tier for open-source projects, making it accessible for developers and organizations of all sizes. Snyk, on the other hand, follows a tiered pricing structure based on factors such as the number of users, the size of code repositories, and additional features required. This may make GuardRails a more cost-effective option for smaller teams or individual developers.

GuardRails vs Snyk

Overview

GuardRails vs Snyk: What are the differences?