Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

gulp

14.2K
9K
+ 1
1.7K
rollup

1.8K
163
+ 1
17
Add tool

gulp vs rollup: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gulp and Rollup are both popular build tools used in web development to automate tasks and optimize code. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Development Approach: Gulp takes a task-based approach, where developers define individual tasks to be executed on specific files. It uses streams to process files in a pipeline manner, allowing for flexibility and easy customization. On the other hand, Rollup follows a module-based approach, where it analyzes the dependency tree of modules and bundles them into a single output file, optimizing runtime performance.

  2. Build Speed: Gulp is known for its fast build times due to its streaming nature, allowing it to process files in memory rather than creating temporary files. However, Rollup's tree-shaking feature, which eliminates unused code, makes it more efficient in terms of generating optimized bundles for production.

  3. Configurability: Gulp provides a flexible and customizable configuration, enabling developers to define their own tasks and specify various plugins and options. It offers a wide range of plugins to execute tasks such as minification, concatenation, and transpilation. Rollup, on the other hand, has a simpler and more opinionated configuration, focusing primarily on bundle optimizations rather than task automation.

  4. Code Splitting: Gulp does not directly support code splitting, which is the ability to split code into smaller chunks and load it on demand. It requires additional plugins and manual configuration to achieve this functionality. Rollup, on the other hand, has built-in support for code splitting, making it easier to create efficient and modular bundles.

  5. ES Module Support: Gulp primarily works with CommonJS modules, although there are plugins available to handle ES modules. Rollup, on the other hand, natively supports ES modules and is optimized for tree-shaking and bundling ES modules efficiently.

  6. Community and Adoption: Gulp has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and ecosystem of plugins and extensions. It is widely adopted and has extensive documentation and resources available. Rollup, although gaining popularity, has a smaller community and plugin ecosystem compared to Gulp.

In summary, Gulp offers a flexible task-based approach with a larger community and faster build times, while Rollup focuses on module-based bundling, code splitting, and native ES module support.

Decisions about gulp and rollup

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of gulp
Pros of rollup
  • 451
    Build speed
  • 277
    Readable
  • 244
    Code-over-configuration
  • 210
    Open source
  • 175
    Node streams
  • 107
    Intuitive
  • 83
    Lots of plugins
  • 66
    Works great with browserify
  • 45
    Easy to Learn
  • 17
    Laravel-elixir
  • 4
    build workflow
  • 3
    Simple & flexible
  • 3
    Great community
  • 2
    Stylus intergration
  • 2
    Clean Code
  • 2
    jade intergration
  • 0
    Well documented
  • 4
    Makes it easy to publish packages
  • 3
    Easier configuration
  • 2
    Better tree shaking
  • 2
    Provides smaller bundle size
  • 1
    Integrates seamlessly with SystemJS
  • 1
    Produces very clean code
  • 1
    Very reliable
  • 1
    Very robust Plugin-API (years old Plugins still work)
  • 1
    Very flexible
  • 1
    Was built with ESM-Modules in mind

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of gulp
Cons of rollup
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      No clear path for static assets
    • 1
      No Loader like Webpack (need to use sjs or ESM imports)
    • 1
      Almost everything needs to be a Plugin
    • 1
      Manual Chunking is a bit buggy

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is gulp?

    Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

    What is rollup?

    It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use gulp?
    What companies use rollup?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with gulp?
    What tools integrate with rollup?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    22177
    GitHubPythonSlack+25
    7
    3225
    What are some alternatives to gulp and rollup?
    Grunt
    The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.
    Webpack
    A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.
    npm
    npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.
    Yarn
    Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
    CodeKit
    Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.
    See all alternatives