StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Gunicorn vs Heroku

Gunicorn vs Heroku

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K

Gunicorn vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between Gunicorn and Heroku. Both Gunicorn and Heroku are popular tools used to deploy and run web applications, but they have distinct features and functionalities.

  1. Gunicorn: Gunicorn stands for "Green Unicorn," which is a Python Web Server Gateway Interface (WSGI) HTTP server. It is designed for running Python web applications and is often used as a production server for Django applications. Gunicorn is known for its simplicity, scalability, and ability to handle multiple concurrent requests.

  2. Heroku: Heroku is a cloud platform as a service (PaaS) that allows developers to build, deploy, and manage their applications effortlessly. It supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, including Python, Node.js, Ruby, Java, and more. Heroku provides a comprehensive set of tools and services to streamline the development, deployment, and scaling process of applications.

  3. Scaling: Gunicorn is capable of scaling horizontally by spawning multiple worker processes to handle incoming requests. It utilizes a pre-fork worker model to achieve concurrency. On the other hand, Heroku allows vertical scaling by adjusting the performance level (dynos) of a web application dyno. Dynos are isolated Linux containers that run the application code.

  4. Deployment: Gunicorn is a standalone server that needs to be configured and managed separately from the application code. It requires a WSGI-compatible web application to be deployed manually or through a separate deployment tool. In contrast, Heroku provides a unified platform where developers can directly deploy their applications using Git or through the Heroku CLI.

  5. Manageability: Gunicorn requires developers to manually manage the configuration, scaling, and monitoring of the server and the web application. It does not provide built-in tools for application management or monitoring. On the other hand, Heroku offers a user-friendly dashboard and command-line interface (CLI) that allows developers to easily manage and monitor their applications, view logs, scale dynos, set environment variables, and more.

  6. Pricing: Gunicorn is an open-source software that is free to use and does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, hosting the Gunicorn server and the underlying infrastructure may incur expenses. On the other hand, Heroku follows a freemium model where developers can start with a free tier, but additional features and resources may require paid subscriptions based on usage.

In summary, Gunicorn is a Python WSGI HTTP server designed for running Python web applications, offering simplicity and scalability. Heroku, on the other hand, is a PaaS that supports multiple programming languages and provides a unified platform for easy deployment, management, and scaling of applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Heroku, Gunicorn

Alex
Alex

Oct 20, 2020

Decided

I'm transitioning to Render from heroku. The pricing scale matches my usage scale, yet it's just as easy to deploy. It's removed a lot of the devops that I don't like to deal with on setting up my own raw *nix box and makes deployment simple and easy!

Clustering I don't use clustering features at the moment but when i need to set up clustering of nodes and discoverability, render will enable that where Heroku would require that I use an external service like redis.

Restarts The restarts are annoying. I understand the reasoning, but I'd rather watch my service if its got a memory leak and work to fix it than to just assume that it has memory leaks and needs to restart.

101k views101k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
Gunicorn
Gunicorn

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
20.5K
Followers
908
Votes
3.2K
Votes
78
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    Storage
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Light
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Heroku, Gunicorn?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase