StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Gunicorn vs OpenResty

Gunicorn vs OpenResty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K
OpenResty
OpenResty
Stacks2.3K
Followers227
Votes0

Gunicorn vs OpenResty: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Gunicorn and OpenResty are both popular web server solutions used for deploying and managing web applications. Below are the key differences between Gunicorn and OpenResty:

1. **Architecture**: Gunicorn is a WSGI HTTP server for Python applications, while OpenResty is a dynamic web platform based on NGINX with built-in LuaJIT. 
2. **Language Support**: Gunicorn is primarily designed for Python applications, whereas OpenResty supports a wide range of programming languages such as Lua, Perl, and Ruby in addition to Python.
3. **Extensibility**: OpenResty provides a rich set of features and modules that can be used to extend its functionality, while Gunicorn offers limited customization options.
4. **Performance**: OpenResty is known for its high performance and ability to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, making it ideal for high-traffic websites, whereas Gunicorn may struggle with the same level of scalability.
5. **Ease of Use**: Gunicorn is easier to set up and use compared to OpenResty, which requires more configuration and expertise due to its complex architecture and extensive feature set.
6. **Community Support**: Gunicorn has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation and support resources, while OpenResty has a smaller but dedicated community focused on leveraging its unique features.

In Summary, Gunicorn and OpenResty differ in terms of architecture, language support, extensibility, performance, ease of use, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
OpenResty
OpenResty

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

OpenResty (aka. ngx_openresty) is a full-fledged web application server by bundling the standard Nginx core, lots of 3rd-party Nginx modules, as well as most of their external dependencies.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
908
Followers
227
Votes
78
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Light
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
NGINX
NGINX

What are some alternatives to Gunicorn, OpenResty?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase