Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Tomcat vs Gunicorn: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Apache Tomcat and Gunicorn
Apache Tomcat and Gunicorn are both widely used server software for hosting web applications, but they have some key differences. Here are the main differences between the two:
Architecture: Apache Tomcat is a web server and servlet container, specifically designed for Java-based web applications. It can handle Java Servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), and other Java-based technologies. On the other hand, Gunicorn is a web server specifically designed for running Python web applications. It supports the WSGI protocol and can run any WSGI-compliant application.
Language Support: Apache Tomcat is primarily used for hosting Java-based web applications and provides native support for Java technologies. It can run any application written in Java, including frameworks like Spring and Struts. Gunicorn, on the other hand, is tailored for Python web applications. It can run Django, Flask, and other Python frameworks without any additional configurations.
Concurrency Model: Apache Tomcat follows a threaded model for handling multiple concurrent requests. It uses a thread pool to process requests in parallel, with each thread handling a single request at a time. In contrast, Gunicorn follows a pre-fork model, where multiple worker processes are created to handle requests. Each worker process runs in its own memory space and can handle multiple requests simultaneously.
Scalability: Apache Tomcat can be easily scaled vertically by adding more server resources like CPU power and memory. It can also be clustered to achieve horizontal scalability, where multiple Tomcat instances work together to handle a higher load. On the other hand, Gunicorn can be scaled horizontally by running multiple instances of the server behind a load balancer. Each Gunicorn instance can be deployed on a separate server to handle a specific number of requests.
Configuration: Apache Tomcat has an XML-based configuration format, where various settings and parameters are specified in XML files. It provides fine-grained control over the server configuration, but it can be complex for beginners. Gunicorn, on the other hand, uses a simple command-line interface and relies on configuration files written in Python. It provides a more intuitive and easy-to-use configuration system.
Community and Ecosystem: Apache Tomcat has a large and active community of developers and users, with a vast ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools built around it. It has been around for a long time and is widely adopted by enterprises. Gunicorn, although not as popular as Tomcat, has a growing community of Python developers and a decent ecosystem of Python web frameworks and utilities.
In summary, Apache Tomcat is a Java-focused web server and servlet container, while Gunicorn is a Python-focused web server. They have different architectures, language support, concurrency models, scalability options, configuration systems, and communities/ecosystems.
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
Pros of Gunicorn
- Python34
- Easy setup30
- Reliable8
- Light3
- Fast3
Pros of Apache Tomcat
- Easy79
- Java72
- Popular49
- Spring web1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gunicorn
Cons of Apache Tomcat
- Blocking - each http request block a thread3
- Easy to set up2