StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Docker Registry
  5. Harbor vs KubeVault

Harbor vs KubeVault

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Harbor
Harbor
Stacks183
Followers185
Votes11
GitHub Stars26.8K
Forks5.0K
KubeVault
KubeVault
Stacks3
Followers18
Votes0

Harbor vs KubeVault: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of container orchestration, tools like Harbor and KubeVault play integral roles in managing containerized applications. Understanding the key differences between Harbor and KubeVault can help organizations make informed decisions about which tool to utilize for their specific requirements.

  1. Architecture: Harbor is a container image registry that integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes, providing a secure and scalable platform for storing and managing container images. On the other hand, KubeVault focuses on securing and managing data in Kubernetes, utilizing HashiCorp Vault for secrets management and encryption.

  2. Functionality: While Harbor primarily focuses on container image storage and management, KubeVault is geared towards ensuring the security and confidentiality of data within Kubernetes clusters. KubeVault offers features like data encryption at rest and in transit, secrets rotation, and fine-grained access control policies.

  3. Community Support: Harbor boasts a large and active community of contributors and users, making it a popular choice for organizations looking for a reliable container registry solution. In comparison, KubeVault is relatively newer in the Kubernetes ecosystem but is gaining traction due to its robust security features.

  4. Integration: Harbor seamlessly integrates with Kubernetes, enabling users to pull and push container images from and to the registry within their Kubernetes environment. On the other hand, KubeVault integrates with HashiCorp Vault for secrets management, enhancing the overall security posture of Kubernetes clusters.

  5. Scalability: Harbor is known for its scalability, allowing organizations to manage a large number of container images efficiently. KubeVault, on the other hand, offers scalability in terms of managing data encryption keys and secrets across various Kubernetes clusters.

  6. Use Cases: Harbor is typically used by organizations that require a secure and reliable container image registry for their Kubernetes deployments. KubeVault is ideal for organizations that prioritize data security and compliance within their Kubernetes clusters, offering features tailored to meet these requirements.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Harbor and KubeVault can help organizations make informed decisions based on their specific needs for container image storage, data security, and management within Kubernetes environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Harbor
Harbor
KubeVault
KubeVault

Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

It is a collection of tools for running HashiCorp Vault on Kubernetes. You can deploy and manage Vault on Kubernetes clusters using KubeVault operator.

Multi-tenant content signing and validation;Image replication between instances;Extensible API and graphical UI;Security and vulnerability analysis;Identity integration and role-based access control;Internationalization
Automatic Initialization & Unsealing; Manage Vault Policy; AWS Secret Engine; Azure Secret Engine; GCP Secret Engine; Database Secret Engine
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
183
Stacks
3
Followers
185
Followers
18
Votes
11
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Good on-premises container registry
  • 1
    Support multiple authentication methods
  • 1
    Supports OIDC
  • 1
    Supports LDAP/Active Directory
  • 1
    Perfect for Teams and Organizations
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Helm
Helm
Vault
Vault
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Harbor, KubeVault?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana