Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Haskell

1.4K
1.2K
+ 1
527
PureScript

88
85
+ 1
18
Add tool

Haskell vs PureScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

Haskell and PureScript are both functional programming languages that share a lot of similarities but also have some key differences. This article aims to highlight and discuss six important differences between Haskell and PureScript.

  1. Syntax and Type System: While both Haskell and PureScript are statically typed functional languages, PureScript uses a simpler and more JavaScript-like syntax compared to Haskell's more complex and mathematically-oriented syntax. Additionally, PureScript has a more expressive type system that allows for more fine-grained control over types.

  2. JavaScript Interoperability: PureScript was primarily designed for compiling to JavaScript, which makes it easy to interoperate with existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks. Haskell, on the other hand, does not have native support for JavaScript interoperability and requires additional tools or libraries to achieve the same level of integration.

  3. Ecosystem and Libraries: Haskell has a more mature and extensive ecosystem with a wide range of libraries and frameworks available for various purposes. PureScript, being a relatively newer language, has a smaller ecosystem but still provides many useful libraries specifically tailored for web development.

  4. Learning Curve: Haskell, due to its mathematical foundations, has a steeper learning curve for beginners. Understanding and applying advanced concepts like monads, type classes, and higher-order functions can be challenging for newcomers. PureScript, while still requiring a solid understanding of functional programming, has a slightly lower learning curve, making it more accessible for beginners.

  5. Performance: Haskell is known for its optimized performance and efficient runtime system. It has powerful optimizations and strict evaluation strategies that can lead to highly performant code. PureScript, on the other hand, may not have the same level of performance optimization and may sometimes rely on JavaScript runtime for execution, which can introduce some overhead.

  6. Community Support: Haskell has a large and active community with numerous online resources, forums, and meetups available for support and learning. PureScript, being a more niche language, has a smaller but growing community. While PureScript's community support may not be as extensive as Haskell's, it is still evolving and has dedicated contributors.

In summary, Haskell and PureScript differ in their syntax, type systems, JavaScript interoperability, ecosystems, learning curve, performance optimizations, and community support. While Haskell provides a more extensive ecosystem and performs better, PureScript offers a simpler syntax, better JavaScript integration, and a more beginner-friendly learning curve.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Haskell
Pros of PureScript
  • 90
    Purely-functional programming
  • 66
    Statically typed
  • 59
    Type-safe
  • 39
    Open source
  • 38
    Great community
  • 31
    Built-in concurrency
  • 30
    Built-in parallelism
  • 30
    Composable
  • 24
    Referentially transparent
  • 20
    Generics
  • 15
    Type inference
  • 15
    Intellectual satisfaction
  • 12
    If it compiles, it's correct
  • 8
    Flexible
  • 8
    Monads
  • 5
    Great type system
  • 4
    Proposition testing with QuickCheck
  • 4
    One of the most powerful languages *(see blub paradox)*
  • 4
    Purely-functional Programming
  • 3
    Highly expressive, type-safe, fast development time
  • 3
    Pattern matching and completeness checking
  • 3
    Great maintainability of the code
  • 3
    Fun
  • 3
    Reliable
  • 2
    Best in class thinking tool
  • 2
    Kind system
  • 2
    Better type-safe than sorry
  • 2
    Type classes
  • 1
    Predictable
  • 1
    Orthogonality
  • 6
    Purely functional
  • 4
    Great FFI to JavaScript
  • 2
    The best type system
  • 2
    Alternate backends
  • 1
    Pursuit
  • 1
    More Haskell-ish than Haskell
  • 1
    Coherent type classes
  • 1
    Libraries

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Haskell
Cons of PureScript
  • 9
    Too much distraction in language extensions
  • 8
    Error messages can be very confusing
  • 5
    Libraries have poor documentation
  • 3
    No good ABI
  • 3
    No best practices
  • 2
    Poor packaging for apps written in it for Linux distros
  • 2
    Sometimes performance is unpredictable
  • 1
    Slow compilation
  • 1
    Monads are hard to understand
  • 1
    No JSX/Template
  • 1
    Have Some Bugs
  • 1
    Not so fancy error reporting

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Haskell?

It is a general purpose language that can be used in any domain and use case, it is ideally suited for proprietary business logic and data analysis, fast prototyping and enhancing existing software environments with correct code, performance and scalability.

What is PureScript?

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Haskell?
What companies use PureScript?
See which teams inside your own company are using Haskell or PureScript.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Haskell?
What tools integrate with PureScript?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Haskell and PureScript?
Scala
Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.
Clojure
Clojure is designed to be a general-purpose language, combining the approachability and interactive development of a scripting language with an efficient and robust infrastructure for multithreaded programming. Clojure is a compiled language - it compiles directly to JVM bytecode, yet remains completely dynamic. Clojure is a dialect of Lisp, and shares with Lisp the code-as-data philosophy and a powerful macro system.
Erlang
Some of Erlang's uses are in telecoms, banking, e-commerce, computer telephony and instant messaging. Erlang's runtime system has built-in support for concurrency, distribution and fault tolerance. OTP is set of Erlang libraries and design principles providing middle-ware to develop these systems.
Rust
Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.
Python
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
See all alternatives