StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Orm
  5. Hibernate vs MikroORM

Hibernate vs MikroORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hibernate
Hibernate
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.2K
Votes34
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
MikroORM
MikroORM
Stacks18
Followers68
Votes24
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks599

Hibernate vs MikroORM: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Hibernate and MikroORM.

1. **Entity Management Approach**: Hibernate uses a traditional Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) approach where the entities are managed by a session while MikroORM employs a Data Mapper pattern, where the entities themselves handle their persistence logic. This difference can affect the performance and complexity of the applications using these frameworks.

2. **TypeScript Support**: MikroORM natively supports TypeScript while Hibernate primarily focuses on Java, making MikroORM a more suitable choice for projects that heavily utilize TypeScript. This can be a crucial factor for developers working in TypeScript-dominant environments.

3. **Configuration Complexity**: Hibernate tends to have a more complex configuration setup compared to MikroORM. MikroORM simplifies the configuration process and provides a more streamlined experience, especially for developers who prioritize ease of setup and maintenance.

4. **Query Language**: Hibernate uses HQL (Hibernate Query Language) or Criteria API for querying data, whereas MikroORM utilizes a fluent Query API with TypeScript support. This makes MikroORM more intuitive for developers familiar with modern query syntax and methodologies.

5. **Performance Optimization**: MikroORM focuses on optimization for modern databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, etc., whereas Hibernate, being a more established framework, might have a wider range of optimizations for various database systems. Depending on the project requirements, the performance implications of the choice between the two frameworks should be carefully considered.

6. **Community Support and Updates**: Hibernate has been around for a longer time, so it has a larger community and a wealth of resources available. On the other hand, MikroORM, being a newer player in the ORM ecosystem, may have more frequent updates and adapt to modern development practices quicker. The choice between the two frameworks may depend on the level of community support desired for a specific project.

In Summary, the key differences between Hibernate and MikroORM include the entity management approach, TypeScript support, configuration complexity, query language, performance optimization, and community support and updates, all of which impact the development experience and choices for developers. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hibernate
Hibernate
MikroORM
MikroORM

Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

-
Implicit Transactions; DRY Entities; Supports both SQL and NoSQL; Clean and Simple Entity Definition; Identity Map; Entity References; Using Entity Constructors; Modelling Relationships; Collections; Unit of Work; Transactions; Cascading persist and remove; Using QueryBuilder; Preloading Deeply Nested Structures via populate; Property Validation; Lifecycle Hooks; Vanilla JS Support; Schema Generator; Entity Generator
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
599
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
18
Followers
1.2K
Followers
68
Votes
34
Votes
24
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 22
    Easy ORM
  • 8
    Easy transaction definition
  • 3
    Is integrated with spring jpa
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 3
    Can't control proxy associations when entity graph used
Pros
  • 5
    Typescript
  • 4
    Supports both SQL and NoSQL
  • 3
    Powered by Unit of Work and Identity Map
  • 3
    Allows multiple ways to define entities
  • 3
    DRY Entities
Integrations
Java
Java
Safari
Safari

What are some alternatives to Hibernate, MikroORM?

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Prisma

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

Entity Framework

Entity Framework

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

peewee

peewee

A small, expressive orm, written in python (2.6+, 3.2+), with built-in support for sqlite, mysql and postgresql and special extensions like hstore.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Entity Framework Core

Entity Framework Core

It is a lightweight, extensible, open source and cross-platform version of the popular Entity Framework data access technology. It can serve as an object-relational mapper (O/RM), enabling .NET developers to work with a database using .NET objects, and eliminating the need for most of the data-access code they usually need to write.

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

Dapper

Dapper

It is an object-relational mapping product for the Microsoft.NET platform: it provides a framework for mapping an object-oriented domain model to a traditional relational database.

NHibernate

NHibernate

It is a mature, open source object-relational mapper for the .NET framework. It's actively developed, fully featured and used in thousands of successful projects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase