StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Hound vs RuboCop

Hound vs RuboCop

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hound
Hound
Stacks41
Followers47
Votes14
RuboCop
RuboCop
Stacks1.4K
Followers222
Votes41

Hound vs RuboCop: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Hound and RuboCop are popular code analysis tools used in the Ruby programming language to maintain code quality and enforce style guidelines. While both serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two tools.

  1. Linting Focus: Hound primarily focuses on linting style violations in code, while RuboCop covers a wider range of issues, including style violations, code smells, and security vulnerabilities. This means RuboCop offers more comprehensive code analysis compared to Hound.

  2. Customization Options: RuboCop provides extensive configuration options for customizing the rules and behaviors of the tool to suit different project requirements. On the other hand, Hound has limited customization capabilities, making it less flexible in adapting to specific coding standards or preferences.

  3. Integration with IDEs: RuboCop seamlessly integrates with popular code editors and IDEs like Visual Studio Code and Sublime Text, allowing developers to run the tool within their development environment. Hound, on the other hand, lacks native support for IDE integrations, which may inconvenience developers who prefer working within their preferred editor.

  4. Community Support and Maintenance: RuboCop has a larger and more active community of contributors compared to Hound. This results in frequent updates, bug fixes, and enhancements to RuboCop, ensuring the tool remains up-to-date with evolving best practices and standards in the Ruby community.

  5. Performance: RuboCop is known for its speed and efficiency in analyzing large codebases, making it a preferred choice for projects with substantial code volumes. On the other hand, Hound may exhibit slower performance when handling extensive codebases, potentially affecting development workflows for larger projects.

In Summary, RuboCop offers more comprehensive code analysis, customization options, and community support compared to Hound, while Hound may be easier to use for simpler projects with less stringent requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hound, RuboCop

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hound
Hound
RuboCop
RuboCop

Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Open source; Free for public repos; Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests;GitHub App
-
Statistics
Stacks
41
Stacks
1.4K
Followers
47
Followers
222
Votes
14
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Comments on style so I don't have to
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Easy configuration
  • 2
    Free for OSS
  • 2
    Inline comments
Pros
  • 9
    Open-source
  • 8
    Completely free
  • 7
    Runs Offline
  • 4
    Can automatically fix some problems
  • 4
    Customizable
Integrations
ESLint
ESLint
GitHub
GitHub
SwiftLint
SwiftLint
Credo
Credo
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Hound, RuboCop?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana