Huginn vs IFTTT

Overview

IFTTT

Stacks298

Followers289

Votes72

Huginn

Stacks19

Followers51

Votes0

GitHub Stars47.9K

Forks4.2K

Huginn vs IFTTT: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Huginn and IFTTT

Huginn and IFTTT are two popular automation platforms that allow users to create workflows and automate various tasks. However, there are several key differences between the two:

Customization: Huginn offers a high level of customization compared to IFTTT. Users can easily create their own agents using a simple Ruby-based scripting language, giving them full control over their automation workflows. On the other hand, IFTTT provides pre-built applets that users can choose from, limiting the extent of customization.
Data Control: Huginn puts a strong emphasis on data privacy and control. Users have full control over their data as it can be hosted on their own server, giving them complete ownership and control. In contrast, IFTTT relies on third-party services and cloud platforms to handle data, which may raise concerns over data privacy and security.
Integration Flexibility: While both platforms offer integration with various web services and APIs, Huginn provides a more versatile integration capability. It supports a wide range of services and APIs, and users can easily create custom integrations through scripts. IFTTT, although it has a large library of supported services, may not provide the same level of flexibility for creating custom integrations.
Complexity: Huginn is designed for advanced users and developers who are comfortable with scripting and programming. It requires a certain level of technical expertise to set up and configure agents. In contrast, IFTTT has a user-friendly interface and does not require any coding skills, making it more accessible to the general public.
Cost: Huginn is an open-source platform, which means it is free to use and can be self-hosted without any additional costs. On the other hand, IFTTT offers a freemium model with limited functionality for free users and a subscription plan for accessing more advanced features and services.
Community and Support: Huginn has an active community of users and developers who constantly contribute to the platform's development and provide support through forums and online communities. IFTTT also has a community, but it may not be as extensive as Huginn's, and the level of support may vary.

In summary, Huginn offers more customization, data control, integration flexibility, complexity, and cost benefits, while IFTTT provides a user-friendly interface and has a larger user base.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

IFTTT	Huginn
It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.	It is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. It's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data.
Solutions by industry; Built for creators and makers; Customize with queries and code	Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow; Watch for air travel or shopping deals; Follow your project names on Twitter and get updates when people mention them; Scrape websites and receive email when they change; Connect to Adioso, HipChat, Basecamp, Growl, FTP, IMAP, Jabber, JIRA, MQTT, nextbus, Pushbullet, Pushover, RSS, Bash, Slack, StubHub, translation APIs, Twilio, Twitter, Wunderground, and Weibo, to name a few; Send digest email with things that you care about at specific times during the day;Run custom JavaScript or CoffeeScript functions
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 47.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.2K
Stacks 298	Stacks 19
Followers 289	Followers 51
Votes 72	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Lots of integrations 17 Free 12 Automates manual tasks 11 Life automation 7 Internet of things	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Jira Slack JavaScript CoffeeScript MQTT HipChat Twilio Basecamp Pushover

What are some alternatives to IFTTT, Huginn?

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Integromat

It is an easy to use, powerful tool with unique features for automating manual processes. Connect your favorite apps, services and devices with each other without having any programming skills.

Actionsflow

It helps you to automate workflows, it's a free IFTTT/Zapier alternative for developers. With this tool, you can connect your favorite apps, data, and APIs, receive notifications of actions as they occur, sync files, collect data, and more.

bip.io

bip.io is an open source web automation platform, making it easy to build powerful personal workflows from your favorite cloud services, applications and devices.

Microsoft Power Automate

Microsoft Power Automate is a cloud-first, comprehensive automation platform, powered by low-code and AI. Modernize business processes, integrate operations at scale, and maintain visibility and control with enterprise-grade governance.

UiPath Studio

It encapsulates both simple and complex solutions for application integration and automating third-party applications, administrative IT tasks, and business IT processes.

Tray.io

It is cloud data integration platform designed for marketing, sales, and customer support teams of medium-sized companies and large enterprises.

Automate.io

Automate.io allows businesses to connect different cloud / SaaS applications, and automate workflows across (marketing, sales, and other internal processes). One can create simple one-to-one integrations to sync data or complex workflows across multiple applications. It helps create workflow bots on top of 100+ popular cloud applications - Salesforce, Google Apps, Trello, Hubspot, Quickbooks, Shopify and many more.

Related Comparisons

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack

Huginn vs IFTTT: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Huginn and IFTTT

Huginn and IFTTT are two popular automation platforms that allow users to create workflows and automate various tasks. However, there are several key differences between the two:

Customization: Huginn offers a high level of customization compared to IFTTT. Users can easily create their own agents using a simple Ruby-based scripting language, giving them full control over their automation workflows. On the other hand, IFTTT provides pre-built applets that users can choose from, limiting the extent of customization.
Data Control: Huginn puts a strong emphasis on data privacy and control. Users have full control over their data as it can be hosted on their own server, giving them complete ownership and control. In contrast, IFTTT relies on third-party services and cloud platforms to handle data, which may raise concerns over data privacy and security.
Integration Flexibility: While both platforms offer integration with various web services and APIs, Huginn provides a more versatile integration capability. It supports a wide range of services and APIs, and users can easily create custom integrations through scripts. IFTTT, although it has a large library of supported services, may not provide the same level of flexibility for creating custom integrations.
Complexity: Huginn is designed for advanced users and developers who are comfortable with scripting and programming. It requires a certain level of technical expertise to set up and configure agents. In contrast, IFTTT has a user-friendly interface and does not require any coding skills, making it more accessible to the general public.
Cost: Huginn is an open-source platform, which means it is free to use and can be self-hosted without any additional costs. On the other hand, IFTTT offers a freemium model with limited functionality for free users and a subscription plan for accessing more advanced features and services.
Community and Support: Huginn has an active community of users and developers who constantly contribute to the platform's development and provide support through forums and online communities. IFTTT also has a community, but it may not be as extensive as Huginn's, and the level of support may vary.

In summary, Huginn offers more customization, data control, integration flexibility, complexity, and cost benefits, while IFTTT provides a user-friendly interface and has a larger user base.