StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. IBM - API Connect vs KrakenD

IBM - API Connect vs KrakenD

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect
Stacks86
Followers133
Votes8
KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9

IBM - API Connect vs KrakenD: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference 1: Scalability and Performance: IBM - API Connect provides high scalability and performance by leveraging its cloud-based infrastructure and advanced caching mechanisms. It can handle high traffic loads and ensures efficient API management and delivery. On the other hand, KrakenD is a lightweight API gateway that focuses on performance optimization, being specifically designed to reduce latency and increase throughput. It uses a single binary distribution and efficient routing algorithms to achieve excellent performance.

  2. Key Difference 2: Deployment Options: IBM - API Connect offers multiple deployment options, including on-premises, cloud-based, and hybrid environments. It provides flexibility to choose the deployment model that suits the organization's requirements. KrakenD, on the other hand, is primarily designed for cloud-native architectures and is well-suited for deploying in containerized environments like Kubernetes or Docker. It is optimized for microservice architectures and integrates smoothly with cloud-based infrastructure.

  3. Key Difference 3: API Management Features: IBM - API Connect offers a comprehensive set of features for API management, including API creation, publishing, security, analytics, and developer portal. It provides a complete end-to-end solution for managing APIs throughout their lifecycle. KrakenD, on the other hand, focuses on the API gateway functionality and emphasizes lightweight integration with existing systems. It provides core API management capabilities like request/response transformations and authentication, but may require complementary tools for full API lifecycle management.

  4. Key Difference 4: Ecosystem and Integration: IBM - API Connect has a rich ecosystem of tools and services that integrate seamlessly with other IBM offerings. It provides a wide range of integration options with various enterprise systems and allows easy integration with IBM Cloud services. KrakenD, being a lightweight API gateway, offers more flexibility in terms of integration. It can be easily integrated with different programming languages, frameworks, and protocols, providing a versatile solution for API integration.

  5. Key Difference 5: Developer Experience and Extensibility: IBM - API Connect offers a user-friendly interface and a developer portal to enable efficient API development and consumption. It provides extensive documentation, code samples, and SDKs for various programming languages, ensuring a smooth developer experience. KrakenD, although relatively lightweight, provides flexibility and extensibility through its middleware approach. It allows developers to add custom logic and modify the API behavior using middleware components, enhancing the overall flexibility and adaptability of the gateway.

  6. Key Difference 6: Commercial Support and Licensing: IBM - API Connect is a commercial offering that provides dedicated support and maintenance services. It is backed by IBM's reputation for reliability and offers different pricing plans based on the organization's requirements. KrakenD, being an open-source project, offers community support and relies on the open-source community for enhancements and bug fixes. It provides free access to its core features and additional commercial support options if needed.

In Summary, IBM - API Connect offers comprehensive API management capabilities with scalability, deployment flexibility, and robust integration options. On the other hand, KrakenD is a lightweight API gateway focused on performance optimization, cloud-native architectures, extensibility, and open-source flexibility. Both platforms have their own strengths and are suitable for different scenarios based on specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

IBM API Connect
IBM API Connect
KrakenD
KrakenD

It is a complete, modern, intuitive and scalable API platform that lets you create, securely expose, manage and monetize APIs across clouds so that you and your customers can power digital applications and spur innovation.

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

Create scalable and secure APIs for application servers, databases, enterprise service buses (ESB) and mainframes;Manage—create and manage portals that allow developers to quickly discover and consume APIs and securely access enterprise data, and monitor APIs to improve performance; Secure—Administrators can manage security and governance over APIs and the microservices. IT can set and enforce API policies to secure back-end information assets and comply with governance and regulatory mandates
Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Statistics
Stacks
86
Stacks
59
Followers
133
Followers
158
Votes
8
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Innovated Approach, Super customer support
  • 2
    Secure API Management
Cons
  • 2
    Not open, no community research. No Trial download
Pros
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 1
    Easiest to install
  • 1
    Easy to install
Integrations
No integrations available
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to IBM API Connect, KrakenD?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope