Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Icinga

119
97
+ 1
0
PRTG

56
66
+ 1
0
Add tool

Icinga vs PRTG: What are the differences?

Introduction

Icinga and PRTG are both network monitoring tools that help organizations ensure the stability and performance of their IT infrastructure. However, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: Icinga is an open-source monitoring tool that follows a distributed architecture, allowing users to set up multiple monitoring nodes to handle a higher workload. PRTG, on the other hand, is a centralized monitoring solution where all monitoring data is stored in a single database.

  2. Customization: Icinga provides a high level of flexibility and customization options, allowing users to modify and extend its functionality according to their specific requirements. PRTG, while offering some customization options, is more focused on simplicity and ease of use, providing pre-configured sensors and templates for quick setup.

  3. Licensing: Icinga is licensed under the GPL (GNU General Public License), which means it is open-source and free to use. PRTG, on the other hand, has a commercial license, with a free version available for limited monitoring. Advanced features and unlimited sensors require a paid license.

  4. Scalability: Due to its distributed architecture, Icinga has better scalability compared to PRTG. Users can add multiple monitoring nodes to handle an increasing workload, making it suitable for large-scale deployments. PRTG, while capable of handling a significant number of sensors, might face limitations when dealing with extremely large networks.

  5. Integration: Icinga offers extensive integration capabilities with various third-party tools and services, including popular notification systems like Slack and PagerDuty. PRTG also provides integration options but may have limitations in terms of the range and availability of integrations.

  6. User Interface: PRTG is known for its user-friendly and intuitive web interface, making it easy for users to navigate and configure their monitoring setup. Icinga, while offering a web-based interface, may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced customization options and configurability.

In Summary, Icinga offers a flexible and customizable monitoring solution with distributed architecture and extensive integration capabilities, while PRTG provides a simple and user-friendly centralized monitoring system with a focus on ease of use.

Decisions about Icinga and PRTG
Matthias Fleschütz
Teamlead IT at NanoTemper Technologies · | 2 upvotes · 131.7K views
  • free open source
  • modern interface and architecture
  • large community
  • extendable I knew Nagios for decades but it was really outdated (by its architecture) at some point. That's why Icinga started first as a fork, not with Icinga2 it is completely built from scratch but backward-compatible with Nagios plugins. Now it has reached a state with which I am confident.
See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Cons of Icinga
Cons of PRTG
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Poor search capabilities
    • 1
      Graphs are static
    • 1
      Running on windows

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Icinga?

    It monitors availability and performance, gives you simple access to relevant data and raises alerts to keep you in the loop. It was originally created as a fork of the Nagios system monitoring application.

    What is PRTG?

    It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Icinga and PRTG as a desired skillset
    Postman
    San Francisco, United States
    What companies use Icinga?
    What companies use PRTG?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Icinga?
    What tools integrate with PRTG?
    What are some alternatives to Icinga and PRTG?
    Nagios
    Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.
    Sensu
    Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.
    Shinken
    Shinken's main goal is to give users a flexible architecture for their monitoring system that is designed to scale to large environments. Shinken is backwards-compatible with the Nagios configuration standard and plugins. It works on any operating system and architecture that supports Python, which includes Windows, GNU/Linux and FreeBSD.
    Zabbix
    Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.
    Prometheus
    Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.
    See all alternatives