InVision vs Proto.io

Overview

InVision

Stacks8.5K

Followers5.8K

Votes618

Proto.io

Stacks51

Followers89

Votes10

InVision vs Proto.io: What are the differences?

Introduction:

InVision and Proto.io are popular prototyping and design tools used by designers and UX professionals. Both platforms offer a range of features to help create interactive prototypes for websites and mobile apps. However, there are key differences between the two that designers should consider when choosing the right tool for their projects.

Collaboration and Feedback: InVision is known for its strong collaboration features, allowing multiple team members to review and leave feedback on prototypes easily. It offers real-time commenting, version control, and presentation tools that make it easy for teams to work together. On the other hand, Proto.io also offers collaboration features, but they are not as robust as InVision's, making it more suited for individual designers or smaller teams.
Animation Capabilities: Proto.io is praised for its powerful animation capabilities, allowing designers to create complex interactions and animations without the need for coding. It offers a wide range of animation options and controls, making it a preferred choice for projects that require detailed animations. In contrast, while InVision does offer some basic animation features, it is not as advanced as Proto.io in terms of creating intricate animations.
Platform Compatibility: InVision is widely used for its integration with other design tools and platforms such as Sketch, Adobe XD, and Photoshop. This makes it easier for designers to seamlessly import designs from these tools and create prototypes in InVision. Proto.io also offers integrations with some tools but may not have the same level of compatibility as InVision, which could be a crucial factor for designers working across multiple platforms.
Learning Curve: In terms of user-friendliness and ease of use, InVision is often considered more intuitive and beginner-friendly compared to Proto.io. Its interface is cleaner and simpler, making it easier for new users to navigate and create prototypes quickly. Proto.io, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for designers who are new to prototyping tools.
Complexity of Interactions: Proto.io is favored for its ability to create complex interactions and dynamic interfaces, making it a suitable choice for projects that require sophisticated user flows. It offers a wide range of gestures, transitions, and interactive elements that allow designers to create highly realistic prototypes. In contrast, InVision may not offer the same level of complexity in interactions, limiting the types of prototypes that can be created using the platform.

In Summary, the key differences between InVision and Proto.io lie in their collaboration features, animation capabilities, platform compatibility, learning curve, and complexity of interactions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

InVision	Proto.io
InVision lets you create stunningly realistic interactive wireframes and prototypes without compromising your creative vision.	Proto.io supports all the major mobile gestures and touch events like tap, tap-hold, swipe, pinch, and zoom. Interaction designers are not limited to a single ‘link’ transition anymore. Instead they can apply animated screen transitions like slide, fade, pop, flip, flow, and turn.
Quickly link up your UX sketches, digital wireframes and even high-fidelity designs to share with your team.;Send out a link to load your project in a browser, present it in-person, or sms your project direct to a mobile device for an instant touchable demo.;Threaded comments connect to a specific point on-screen and double up as to-dos.;InVision creates a simple project checklist of all the feedback provided from in-screen comments.;Quick glance summaries of each design’s activity let you track progress and allow you to drill down into details.;Collaborate with your team anywhere. Track their engagement in the project at a specific time.;Just save your screens to the InVision Sync folder on your Mac and we’ll take care of the rest. Plus, you’ll get desktop notifications when others leave comments or upload new screens.;Just hit the switch to get additional functionality that integrates throughout your account.	Interactive designs;Prototype for all devices;Wonderful UI libraries;Actual device testing;Share, add comments;Publish and Export to HTML;States, Animations & Timelines;Drag & Rotate;Variables & Item properties;Intuitive editor interface with drag-n-drop features, no coding required;Silly-fast mobile prototyping;Templates and reusable containers for easy development;Powerful digital asset manager;HTML5 fonts support;Auto-save function;Version history and rollback;100% web-based, nothing to install;Custom branding for your account and prototypes;Overwhelming technical support;Extensive documentation, screencasts, examples and sample prototypes
Statistics
Stacks 8.5K	Stacks 51
Followers 5.8K	Followers 89
Votes 618	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 158 Collaborative 128 Simple 95 Pretty 79 Quick 45 Works with lots of devices	Pros 4 Easy to get started with a good set of UI controls 3 Try prototype on mobile device 3 Design on site, better than simply importing stuff
Integrations
Dropbox	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to InVision, Proto.io?

Avocode

Avocode is a cross-platform app that helps designers and developers collaborate and easily handoff designs. Avocode comes with 14 days free trial.

Marvel

A super simple tool that turns any image (including PSDs) or sketch into interactive prototypes for any device. Powered by Dropbox.

Doorbell.io

Free service which enables you to easily gather in-app user feedback, on websites, iOS apps, and Android apps.

Usersnap

Usersnap is the #1 bug tracking tool for every web project. Collaborate on screenshots with colleagues and clients. Usersnap makes tracking bugs and collecting feedback on design drafts and prototypes easy.

WebEngage

WebEngage is a customer engagement Saas. It enables gathering of relevant customer data through feedback and survey. It also enables notification of services and discounts to the market. WebEngage offers solution for personalized real time marketing, customer insights, instantaneous feedback and personalized marketing

Atomic

Pull in designs from Photoshop or Sketch, instantly animate between them, and share your prototypes with anyone or view on any device via URL.

Axure

The way to plan, prototype, and hand off to developers, all without code. A wireframing, rapid prototyping, documentation and specification software tool aimed at web, mobile and desktop applications.

MarkUp

It allows you to turn your website into a dynamic canvas ready for feedback and collaboration. Streamline your feedback with a quicker, easier, and clearer process.

Moqups

Achieve flow with our web app for creating mockups, wireframes and interactive prototypes that look great onscreen and on paper thanks to the Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) technology.

Queue

It helps web designers avoid confusing feedback by letting their team and clients leave comments directly on the live website so projects are finished 10x faster. Just paste a URL into Queue to enable commenting directly on the website.

Related Comparisons

InVision vs Proto.io: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Collaboration and Feedback: InVision is known for its strong collaboration features, allowing multiple team members to review and leave feedback on prototypes easily. It offers real-time commenting, version control, and presentation tools that make it easy for teams to work together. On the other hand, Proto.io also offers collaboration features, but they are not as robust as InVision's, making it more suited for individual designers or smaller teams.
Animation Capabilities: Proto.io is praised for its powerful animation capabilities, allowing designers to create complex interactions and animations without the need for coding. It offers a wide range of animation options and controls, making it a preferred choice for projects that require detailed animations. In contrast, while InVision does offer some basic animation features, it is not as advanced as Proto.io in terms of creating intricate animations.
Platform Compatibility: InVision is widely used for its integration with other design tools and platforms such as Sketch, Adobe XD, and Photoshop. This makes it easier for designers to seamlessly import designs from these tools and create prototypes in InVision. Proto.io also offers integrations with some tools but may not have the same level of compatibility as InVision, which could be a crucial factor for designers working across multiple platforms.
Learning Curve: In terms of user-friendliness and ease of use, InVision is often considered more intuitive and beginner-friendly compared to Proto.io. Its interface is cleaner and simpler, making it easier for new users to navigate and create prototypes quickly. Proto.io, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for designers who are new to prototyping tools.
Complexity of Interactions: Proto.io is favored for its ability to create complex interactions and dynamic interfaces, making it a suitable choice for projects that require sophisticated user flows. It offers a wide range of gestures, transitions, and interactive elements that allow designers to create highly realistic prototypes. In contrast, InVision may not offer the same level of complexity in interactions, limiting the types of prototypes that can be created using the platform.

In Summary, the key differences between InVision and Proto.io lie in their collaboration features, animation capabilities, platform compatibility, learning curve, and complexity of interactions.

InVision vs Proto.io

Overview