Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
InVision vs Zeplin: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare and highlight the key differences between InVision and Zeplin. Both InVision and Zeplin are popular design collaboration tools used in the product development process. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart from each other.
Design Collaboration: InVision is primarily focused on design collaboration and prototyping. It allows designers to create interactive click-through prototypes that can be shared with stakeholders for feedback and testing. Zeplin, on the other hand, is more focused on developer handoff. It provides a platform for designers to export design assets and specifications to developers in a way that is easy to understand and implement.
Workflow Integration: InVision offers seamless integration with design tools such as Sketch and Adobe XD. Users can import their designs directly into InVision and sync them with their prototypes. Zeplin, on the other hand, is compatible with a wider range of design tools, including Sketch, XD, Figma, and Photoshop. This allows designers to work with their preferred design tool while still being able to use Zeplin for developer handoff.
Design Version Control: InVision provides version control features that allow designers to manage and track different iterations of their designs. This is particularly useful in collaborative design projects where multiple designers are working on the same project simultaneously. Zeplin, on the other hand, does not have built-in design version control features. It primarily focuses on presenting design specs and assets to developers.
Design Handoff: InVision is known for its powerful design handoff capabilities. It provides developers with a complete set of design specifications and assets, including CSS styles, font sizes, and distances. Developers can inspect and download these assets directly from the InVision platform, making the handoff process more efficient. Zeplin also provides design handoff features, but it is more focused on extracting design assets and specifications rather than providing a comprehensive design handoff experience.
Feedback and Collaboration: InVision offers robust feedback and collaboration features, allowing stakeholders to leave comments, suggestions, and annotations directly on the design prototypes. This streamlines the feedback loop and makes it easier for designers to iterate on their designs. Although Zeplin does not provide the same level of interactive feedback and collaboration features as InVision, it does offer a platform for designers and developers to communicate and discuss design details.
Project Management: InVision includes project management features that allow users to create tasks, assign them to team members, and track their progress. It provides a centralized platform for project management, design collaboration, and prototyping. Zeplin, on the other hand, does not have built-in project management features. It focuses more on design handoff and collaboration.
In summary, InVision and Zeplin have distinct focuses and functionalities. InVision is primarily a design collaboration and prototyping tool, while Zeplin is more focused on design handoff and developer collaboration. Each tool has its own strengths and can be beneficial depending on the specific needs of the project.
Hello, I want to start an unlimited graphic design service. (yes, yet another one, but bear with me)
It’s the second week that I’m working on this project, my goal is to test the market as soon as possible.
One element that is missing is the solution to handle communication between the clients and the designers.
• Mandatory: it needs to communicate instructions, progress/status, and design files (exported from Adobe Illustrator or similar). • Optionally it would also display the design inside the app so the files don’t need to be opened. • Optionally it would let the client easily mark the design where he wants revision.
• Mandatory: it needs to have unlimited clients and unlimited projects (I’ll have hundreds of clients and each will have at least one project) • Optionally it would auto-assign a new project to the first available designer, or let the designers choose themselves which project they want to work on • Optionally it would have groups (corresponding to a subscription plan) with different clients and different designers in each • Optionally it would communicate with other apps so that client and designer management tasks (access, payment, etc) can be automated
I’m open to all suggestions, not just the selection above. Ultimately I guess I’ll have a custom app developed on a no-code platform, but to begin with I need something simple and ready.
Reminder: it is only for graphic design, between my designers and my clients
Zeplin is great for Developer handoff and setting as source of truth for Design and Developemt. InViosion is the standard for communicating/testing design ideas and prototypes with stakeholders. Both applications offer unlimited projects. I use them on a daily basis at big enterprises and for small weekend projects.
I have been using Basecamp since 2008 to handle my client communications. I have gone through all of its three iterations.
I'd recommend Basecamp above the others because:
- It is a communication tool through and through. Looking at your description, that seems to be what you need. Zeplin is a developer handoff tool. It isn't designed to cover a more broad use case as you describe. Invision has some features that you want, but it is primarily a tool for building quick low-fidelity prototypes from website mockups. Figma is a great design tool. For the last two, communication is a secondary feature.
- It was designed by a design agency (37 Signals) for their own needs, which were quite similar to yours. (They later closed the agency to focus on Basecamp as a product full-time)
- It has flat pricing that doesn't count the number of projects, clients or team members you have. You don't have to think twice about opening another project or inviting another user. You always pay the same price.
- It can separate team and client communications. The team can talk about something without the client ever seeing it, in the same context.
- It can keep todo lists, which I think you will need anyway.
- Access control is based on projects. Every team member or client will only see the projects they are invited to. They will not even know the existence of others. (Except admins. They can see and join all projects)
- It is easy to understand and use. The design is free of clutter and easy on the eyes. Your clients (especially the tech-averse ones) will appreciate it.
- It has mobile/desktop apps with the full functionality of the web app. You won't have to wait for someone to sit down to get a quick approval.
The only real downside for me was the lack of language support in the user interface. You will be fine if your users understand some very basic written English. Some of my clients did not, so I had to walk them through it.
Pros of InVision
- Collaborative158
- Simple128
- Pretty95
- Quick79
- Works with lots of devices45
- Free33
- Cool for remote team prototyping29
- It revolutionized the way I share work with clients17
- Legendary customer support10
- Dropbox Integration8
- Easy3
- Collaboration3
- Rapid Prototyping2
- LiveShare2
- Annotation1
- They are always improving the product suite1
- Beautiful UI1
- Brings mockups to life1
- Allows for a comprehensive workflow1
Pros of Zeplin
- Avoid the insanity of extract this info from Photoshop7
- Free7
- CSS2
- Works with lots of devices2
- HTML2
- SVG2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of InVision
Cons of Zeplin
- SVG8