Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Istio

945
1.5K
+ 1
54
KrakenD

57
158
+ 1
9
Add tool

Istio vs KrakenD: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference 1: Architecture - Istio is a service mesh platform that provides fine-grained control over network traffic between microservices, using a sidecar proxy injected in each service instance. On the other hand, KrakenD is an API gateway that acts as a reverse proxy for an entire API backend, handling all client requests and forwarding them to the appropriate microservices.
  2. Key Difference 2: Feature Set - Istio offers advanced features like service discovery, load balancing, traffic management, security, and observability. It provides features like circuit breaking, timeouts, retries, and distributed tracing. In contrast, KrakenD focuses on high-performance API gateway functionalities, such as request routing, rate limiting, API composition, and response caching.
  3. Key Difference 3: Configuration - Istio employs a declarative configuration model, where users define the desired state of the system using custom resource definitions (CRDs) and Kubernetes configuration files. KrakenD follows a more traditional imperative configuration model, allowing users to define the API gateway behavior using a configuration file in YAML or JSON format.
  4. Key Difference 4: Scalability - Istio is designed to handle large-scale deployments and can support thousands of microservices with low latency and high throughput. It achieves this through intelligent load balancing and connection pooling. KrakenD, on the other hand, is optimized for high-performance throughput, enabling it to handle thousands of concurrent client connections efficiently.
  5. Key Difference 5: Ecosystem Integration - Istio integrates seamlessly into Kubernetes environments and has native integrations with tools like Prometheus for monitoring, Jaeger for distributed tracing, and Grafana for visualization. KrakenD is also Kubernetes-friendly but offers a wider range of integrations, including support for GraphQL, Open Policy Agent (OPA) for policy enforcement, and Kong plugins for extending functionality.
  6. Key Difference 6: Adoption and Maturity - Istio has gained significant industry adoption and is supported by major cloud providers like Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. It has a large and active community contributing to its development and has reached a high level of maturity. KrakenD, although also widely used, may not have the same level of industry recognition and support as Istio.

In summary, Istio and KrakenD have key differences in architecture, feature set, configuration approach, scalability, ecosystem integration, and industry adoption.

Decisions about Istio and KrakenD
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 307.3K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Istio
Pros of KrakenD
  • 14
    Zero code for logging and monitoring
  • 9
    Service Mesh
  • 8
    Great flexibility
  • 5
    Resiliency
  • 5
    Powerful authorization mechanisms
  • 5
    Ingress controller
  • 4
    Easy integration with Kubernetes and Docker
  • 4
    Full Security
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 1
    Easy to install
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easiest to install

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Istio
Cons of KrakenD
  • 17
    Performance
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Istio?

    Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

    What is KrakenD?

    Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Istio?
    What companies use KrakenD?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Istio?
    What tools integrate with KrakenD?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Istio and KrakenD?
    linkerd
    linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.
    Envoy
    Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Conduit
    Conduit is a lightweight open source service mesh designed for performance, power, and ease of use when running applications on Kubernetes. Conduit is incredibly fast, lightweight, fundamentally secure, and easy to get started with.
    Kong
    Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.
    See all alternatives