StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Istio vs KrakenD

Istio vs KrakenD

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Istio
Istio
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.5K
Votes54
GitHub Stars37.6K
Forks8.1K
KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9

Istio vs KrakenD: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference 1: Architecture - Istio is a service mesh platform that provides fine-grained control over network traffic between microservices, using a sidecar proxy injected in each service instance. On the other hand, KrakenD is an API gateway that acts as a reverse proxy for an entire API backend, handling all client requests and forwarding them to the appropriate microservices.
  2. Key Difference 2: Feature Set - Istio offers advanced features like service discovery, load balancing, traffic management, security, and observability. It provides features like circuit breaking, timeouts, retries, and distributed tracing. In contrast, KrakenD focuses on high-performance API gateway functionalities, such as request routing, rate limiting, API composition, and response caching.
  3. Key Difference 3: Configuration - Istio employs a declarative configuration model, where users define the desired state of the system using custom resource definitions (CRDs) and Kubernetes configuration files. KrakenD follows a more traditional imperative configuration model, allowing users to define the API gateway behavior using a configuration file in YAML or JSON format.
  4. Key Difference 4: Scalability - Istio is designed to handle large-scale deployments and can support thousands of microservices with low latency and high throughput. It achieves this through intelligent load balancing and connection pooling. KrakenD, on the other hand, is optimized for high-performance throughput, enabling it to handle thousands of concurrent client connections efficiently.
  5. Key Difference 5: Ecosystem Integration - Istio integrates seamlessly into Kubernetes environments and has native integrations with tools like Prometheus for monitoring, Jaeger for distributed tracing, and Grafana for visualization. KrakenD is also Kubernetes-friendly but offers a wider range of integrations, including support for GraphQL, Open Policy Agent (OPA) for policy enforcement, and Kong plugins for extending functionality.
  6. Key Difference 6: Adoption and Maturity - Istio has gained significant industry adoption and is supported by major cloud providers like Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. It has a large and active community contributing to its development and has reached a high level of maturity. KrakenD, although also widely used, may not have the same level of industry recognition and support as Istio.

In summary, Istio and KrakenD have key differences in architecture, feature set, configuration approach, scalability, ecosystem integration, and industry adoption.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Istio, KrakenD

Prateek
Prateek

Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k
Comments
lyc218
lyc218

Feb 21, 2020

Needs advice

Envoy proxy is widely adopted in many companies for service mesh proxy, but it utilizes BoringSSL by default. Red Hat OpenShift fork envoy branch with their own OpenSSL support, I wonder any other companies are also using envoy-openssl branch for compatibility? How about AWS App Mesh?

Any input would be much appreciated!

42.7k views42.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Istio
Istio
KrakenD
KrakenD

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

-
Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Statistics
GitHub Stars
37.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
8.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
59
Followers
1.5K
Followers
158
Votes
54
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Zero code for logging and monitoring
  • 9
    Service Mesh
  • 8
    Great flexibility
  • 5
    Resiliency
  • 5
    Ingress controller
Cons
  • 17
    Performance
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 1
    Easiest to install
  • 1
    Easy to install
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to Istio, KrakenD?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp