Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Istio

949
1.5K
+ 1
54
Netflix OSS

75
144
+ 1
0
Add tool

Istio vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?

Istio vs Netflix OSS

Introduction

Istio and Netflix OSS are popular open-source platforms that provide solutions for managing microservices architectures. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms. This article will outline six significant differences between Istio and Netflix OSS.

  1. Architecture: Istio is built on top of the service mesh architecture, which means it operates at the network layer and provides a set of features for managing, securing, and monitoring traffic between services. On the other hand, Netflix OSS focuses on providing libraries and components for building resilient and scalable applications.

  2. Language Support: Istio is agnostic to the programming languages used by the microservices, allowing developers to use any language for their services. In contrast, Netflix OSS primarily supports Java-based services, as most of its components and libraries are written in Java.

  3. Service Discovery: Istio has built-in service discovery capabilities that enable automatic registration and discovery of services within the mesh. It leverages platforms like Kubernetes to dynamically discover services and route traffic to them. Netflix OSS, on the other hand, relies on tools like Netflix Eureka for service discovery, which can be used outside the realm of Kubernetes.

  4. Traffic Management: Istio provides advanced traffic management capabilities such as intelligent load balancing, circuit breaking, and traffic routing based on various criteria. It allows for fine-grained control over traffic behavior. Netflix OSS also offers some traffic management features through components like Netflix Ribbon and Zuul, but it is not as comprehensive as Istio.

  5. Observability: Istio offers powerful observability features, including request tracing, distributed tracing, and metrics collection at the service mesh level. It provides clear visibility into the behavior of services and helps in troubleshooting and debugging. Netflix OSS, while it provides some observability components like Netflix Spectator and Atlas, does not offer the same level of granularity and depth as Istio.

  6. Security: Istio focuses heavily on security and provides features like mutual TLS authentication, access control, and secure communication between services. It ensures that communication within the mesh is secure and authenticated. Netflix OSS, on the other hand, primarily relies on other components or systems to handle security, such as perimeter authentication solutions and SSL/TLS termination at the load balancer level.

In summary, Istio is a comprehensive service mesh platform that offers a wide range of features for managing, securing, and observing microservices architectures. Netflix OSS, while it provides some similar capabilities, is more focused on providing libraries and components to build scalable and resilient applications.

Decisions about Istio and Netflix OSS
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 314.2K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Istio
Pros of Netflix OSS
  • 14
    Zero code for logging and monitoring
  • 9
    Service Mesh
  • 8
    Great flexibility
  • 5
    Resiliency
  • 5
    Powerful authorization mechanisms
  • 5
    Ingress controller
  • 4
    Easy integration with Kubernetes and Docker
  • 4
    Full Security
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Istio
    Cons of Netflix OSS
    • 17
      Performance
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What companies use Istio?
      What companies use Netflix OSS?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Istio?
      What tools integrate with Netflix OSS?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Istio and Netflix OSS?
        linkerd
        linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.
        Envoy
        Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
        Kubernetes
        Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
        Conduit
        Conduit is a lightweight open source service mesh designed for performance, power, and ease of use when running applications on Kubernetes. Conduit is incredibly fast, lightweight, fundamentally secure, and easy to get started with.
        Kong
        Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.
        See all alternatives