StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Java Build Tools
  5. JFrog Artifactory vs Sonatype Nexus

JFrog Artifactory vs Sonatype Nexus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus
Stacks526
Followers370
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks672
JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Stacks342
Followers374
Votes0

JFrog Artifactory vs Sonatype Nexus: What are the differences?

JFrog Artifactory and Sonatype Nexus are two popular tools for managing artifacts in a software development environment. While both tools serve similar purposes, they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Deployment Process: One of the main differences between JFrog Artifactory and Sonatype Nexus is the deployment process. JFrog Artifactory uses a unique checksum-based deployment process, which ensures that artifacts are only deployed once, even if they are uploaded multiple times. On the other hand, Sonatype Nexus uses a traditional file system-based deployment process.

  2. Repository Types: JFrog Artifactory supports different types of repositories, including Maven, Gradle, npm, and Docker repositories. It also provides support for Universal Repository, which allows you to manage any package format. Sonatype Nexus, on the other hand, primarily focuses on supporting Maven repositories, although it does offer limited support for other repository types as well.

  3. User Interface: The user interface of JFrog Artifactory and Sonatype Nexus differs in terms of design and functionality. JFrog Artifactory has a modern and intuitive UI, which makes it easier to navigate and perform tasks. Sonatype Nexus, on the other hand, has a more traditional and functional UI, which may require more clicks to access certain features.

  4. Integration with CI/CD Tools: Both JFrog Artifactory and Sonatype Nexus integrate with popular CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and Bamboo. However, JFrog Artifactory further enhances its integration capabilities by providing native plugins for these tools, which allows for seamless integration and easy configuration. Sonatype Nexus, on the other hand, relies on third-party plugins for integrating with CI/CD tools.

  5. Enterprise Features: JFrog Artifactory offers a range of enterprise features, including high availability and disaster recovery options, advanced access control and permission management, and analytics and monitoring capabilities. Sonatype Nexus, while also providing some enterprise features, does not offer the same level of advanced functionality as JFrog Artifactory in these areas.

  6. Community Support and Development: JFrog Artifactory has a large and active community of users, which has contributed to the development of a vast ecosystem of plugins and integrations. Sonatype Nexus also has a community of users, but it is generally smaller compared to JFrog Artifactory.

In summary, JFrog Artifactory and Sonatype Nexus differ in their deployment process, repository types supported, user interface, integration with CI/CD tools, enterprise features offered, and community support and development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sonatype Nexus, JFrog Artifactory

tutulbuet
tutulbuet

May 6, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaGitHubGitHubJFrog ArtifactoryJFrog Artifactory

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for example Java SDK or any software version that has a potential vulnerability, we search the web to find out the solution and usually install a later version or patch downloading from the web. The problem is, as we are downloading it from web and there are a number of servers where we patch and as an ultimate outcome different people downloads different version and so forth. So I want to create a repository for such binaries so that we use the same patch for all servers.

When I was thinking about the repo, obviously first thought came as GitHub.. But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking is JFrog Artifactory which stores the binaries and the package software.

What is your recommendation?

258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus
JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.

Supports ZIP;System information;Metrices;Logging and Log viewer
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
672
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
526
Stacks
342
Followers
370
Followers
374
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
PHP
PHP
.NET
.NET
Swift
Swift
Debian
Debian
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to Sonatype Nexus, JFrog Artifactory?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana