StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Jinja2 vs Twig

Jinja2 vs Twig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Twig
Twig
Stacks382
Followers157
Votes8
Jinja
Jinja
Stacks2.3K
Followers292
Votes8
GitHub Stars11.2K
Forks1.7K

Jinja2 vs Twig: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Jinja2 and Twig are both popular templating languages used in web development. While they have similarities, there are key differences between the two.

1. Template Syntax:

Jinja2 uses double curly braces {{ }} to denote variables and expressions, and {% %} for control structures like loops and conditionals. Twig, on the other hand, uses similar syntax but with slight differences. It uses {% %} for statements and the variables are enclosed in {{ }}.

2. Template Inheritance:

Jinja2 supports template inheritance, which allows developers to create a base template that can be extended and overridden by child templates. This feature enables code reuse and modular design. Twig also supports template inheritance, but it has a more powerful and flexible mechanism for overriding specific blocks of content within the base template.

3. Filters and Functions:

Both Jinja2 and Twig provide a wide range of filters and functions for manipulating data within templates. However, the available filters and functions may differ between the two. Twig has a larger number of built-in filters and functions compared to Jinja2, offering more flexibility and convenience.

4. Security Features:

Jinja2 has a limited set of built-in security features, which may require additional configuration to ensure safer template rendering. Twig, on the other hand, implements a stricter security model by default, which protects against common vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. This makes Twig a more secure choice for handling user-generated content.

5. Performance:

Jinja2 is known for its high performance and efficiency. It achieves this through various optimization techniques, such as template precompilation and bytecode caching. Twig also emphasizes performance but may not be as fast as Jinja2 in certain scenarios due to its more extensive feature set and flexibility.

6. Community and Ecosystem:

Jinja2 has a larger and more mature community with a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions developed over the years. This makes it easier to find resources, examples, and support when working with Jinja2. Twig, while also having an active community, may have a smaller ecosystem in comparison.

In Summary, Jinja2 and Twig differ in their template syntax, template inheritance, available filters and functions, security features, performance, and community/ecosystem size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Twig
Twig
Jinja
Jinja

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented
Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
382
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
157
Followers
292
Votes
8
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Native html, xml, txt etc
  • 2
    Gulp
  • 2
    Front to back with no efforts
  • 2
    For both nodejs and php
Pros
  • 8
    It is simple to use
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Ember.js
Ember.js
Git
Git
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Twig, Jinja?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase