StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Communications SDK
  5. Jitsi vs OpenTok

Jitsi vs OpenTok

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenTok
OpenTok
Stacks60
Followers159
Votes8
Jitsi
Jitsi
Stacks251
Followers720
Votes93
GitHub Stars4.3K
Forks983

Jitsi vs OpenTok: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jitsi and OpenTok are two popular platforms used for video conferencing and real-time communication. While both serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between the two that set them apart. In this Markdown document, we will explore and compare these differences.

  1. Scalability: One key difference between Jitsi and OpenTok lies in their scalability. Jitsi is an open-source solution, allowing users to deploy their own self-hosted Jitsi Meet infrastructure. This gives users the flexibility to scale their video conferencing capabilities according to their specific needs. On the other hand, OpenTok is a cloud-based platform provided by Vonage (formerly TokBox) and offers scalable infrastructure hosted by Vonage itself. This means that users of OpenTok do not need to worry about setting up and maintaining their own infrastructure, making it easier for organizations with limited resources or tech expertise to scale their video conferencing capabilities.

  2. Customization: Another significant difference between Jitsi and OpenTok is the level of customization they offer. Jitsi being an open-source solution provides greater flexibility for customization. Users have full access to the source code and can modify the platform according to their specific requirements. On the other hand, OpenTok is a commercial platform and offers limited customization options. While some customization can be done through the provided APIs and SDKs, the level of control available is comparatively less than that of Jitsi.

  3. Ease of use: Jitsi and OpenTok also differ in terms of ease of use. Jitsi is known for its simplicity and user-friendly interface. It provides a straightforward approach to video conferencing, making it easy for both technical and non-technical users to join meetings. OpenTok, on the other hand, provides a more feature-rich experience with added functionalities. This can make it slightly complex for users who are not familiar with video conferencing platforms, requiring some learning curve to navigate and utilize all the available features.

  4. Supported platforms: Jitsi and OpenTok differ in terms of the platforms they support. Jitsi is built using standard web technologies such as WebRTC and can be accessed via web browsers on desktop and mobile devices. It can also be used as a standalone desktop application. OpenTok, on the other hand, supports a wider range of platforms including web browsers, iOS, Android, and even smart TVs. This broader platform support makes OpenTok a more versatile choice for organizations that require video conferencing across multiple devices and operating systems.

  5. Security: Both Jitsi and OpenTok prioritize security, but they approach it differently. Jitsi, being self-hosted, gives users complete control over the security aspects of their video conferencing infrastructure. Organizations can implement their own security measures and protocols to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of their meetings. OpenTok, being a cloud-based platform, relies on Vonage's security measures to protect user meetings. While Vonage maintains a robust security infrastructure, some organizations may prefer the additional control offered by self-hosted solutions like Jitsi.

  6. Pricing: Finally, Jitsi and OpenTok differ in terms of pricing. Jitsi is an open-source solution and is free to use. Organizations can deploy their own Jitsi infrastructure without incurring any direct costs. On the other hand, OpenTok is a commercial platform and has different pricing plans based on the usage and features required. This makes Jitsi a more cost-effective choice for organizations looking for a budget-friendly video conferencing solution.

In summary, Jitsi and OpenTok differ in terms of scalability, customization, ease of use, supported platforms, security, and pricing. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the organization or individual user.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenTok
OpenTok
Jitsi
Jitsi

It adds the clarity and emotion of face-to-face communication to your brand whether you're developing for the web, iOS, or Android. We make the integration of high-quality live video a breeze so that you can focus on building a great product.

Jitsi (acquired by 8x8) is a set of open-source projects that allows you to easily build and deploy secure videoconferencing solutions. At the heart of Jitsi are Jitsi Videobridge and Jitsi Meet, which let you have conferences on the internet, while other projects in the community enable other features such as audio, dial-in, recording, and simulcasting.

Layout control- Create layouts that complement your content and empower your application's experience;Peer-to-peer calls- Take advantage of peer-to-peer calling for better quality and lower- latency 1:1 scenarios;Archiving- Download or save calls for future playback with this extension to the OpenTok platform;Multi-party calls- Bring small groups together for business or social gatherings using face-to-face video;Moderation- Tame the wild-west nature of social video with OpenTok's moderation functionality;Broadcast- Create a virtual stage and invite an audience of thousands to join you.
Web, Android, iOS, React-native, and Electron apps;Ubuntu and Debian Packages install in minutes;Customize with config files or change the code
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
983
Stacks
60
Stacks
251
Followers
159
Followers
720
Votes
8
Votes
93
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Video Archiving to s3
  • 2
    Easy setup
Pros
  • 32
    Open Source
  • 20
    Entirely free conferencing
  • 19
    Unlimited time
  • 5
    Accessible from browser
  • 3
    WebRTC standard
Cons
  • 7
    UnLimited time
  • 5
    No multiplatform
  • 1
    Great quality
  • 1
    Great features
  • 1
    Live conference statistics

What are some alternatives to OpenTok, Jitsi?

Discord

Discord

Discord is a modern free voice & text chat app for groups of gamers. Our resilient Erlang backend running on the cloud has built in DDoS protection with automatic server failover.

Skype

Skype

Skype’s text, voice and video make it simple to share experiences with the people that matter to you, wherever they are.

Twilio

Twilio

Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs.

Zoom

Zoom

Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems.

Google Meet

Google Meet

It is the business-oriented version of Google's Hangouts platform and is suitable for businesses of all sizes. It allows users to dial in phone numbers to access meetings, thus enabling users with slow internet connection to call in.

Chat by Stream

Chat by Stream

Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users.

SendBird

SendBird

SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET.

Nexmo

Nexmo

Nexmo connects your apps directly to carriers around the world. Integrate SMS and Voice messages using one simple API. Use Nexmo Verity to register users, verify transactions, and implement two factor authentication.

Sinch

Sinch

Sinch makes it easy for developers to add voice, messaging and SMS to their apps with just a few lines of code. Enrich your apps with communications that your users will love.

Plivo

Plivo

Plivo provides basic building block APIs in the form of Plivo XML and HTTP API, to create telephony apps, so developers can completely do away with learning the nitty-gritty of the telephony plumbing.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope