Selenium vs jsdom

Overview

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

jsdom

Stacks1.6K

Followers55

Votes1

GitHub Stars21.3K

Forks1.8K

Selenium vs jsdom: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of web development and testing, understanding the key differences between Selenium and jsdom is essential for selecting the right tool for the job. Both are popular choices for testing web applications and manipulating the DOM, but they have distinct features that set them apart.

Browser Interaction: Selenium is primarily used for automating interactions with real browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, allowing for a more realistic simulation of user behavior. On the other hand, jsdom is a lightweight, pure JavaScript implementation of the DOM that simulates a browser environment within Node.js, making it ideal for server-side testing and manipulation of DOM elements.
Support for Complex Browser Interactions: Selenium provides robust support for handling complex browser interactions, such as clicking on elements, filling out forms, and navigating through different pages. In contrast, jsdom has limitations when it comes to simulating certain browser behaviors like CSS rendering, layout calculations, and other client-specific features.
Performance: Selenium is typically slower due to its reliance on real browsers, which can lead to longer test execution times, especially when running numerous tests in parallel. Jsdom, being a lightweight library, has faster execution times and is more suitable for quick and simple DOM manipulations without the overhead of launching a full-fledged browser instance.
Testing Environments: Selenium is well-suited for end-to-end testing in a real browser environment, ensuring that the web application behaves as expected across different browsers. Jsdom, on the other hand, is more suitable for unit testing and integration testing within a Node.js environment, where a full browser runtime is not required.
Integration with Testing Frameworks: Selenium seamlessly integrates with popular testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and Jest, providing a wide range of features for writing and executing test cases. Jsdom, being a JavaScript library, can be easily integrated with tools like Mocha and Jasmine for testing DOM manipulation and server-side logic.
Community and Support: Selenium has a vast community of developers and contributors that actively maintain and improve the tool, ensuring constant updates and support. Jsdom, while also popular, may have a smaller community in comparison, which could affect the availability of resources and documentation for troubleshooting and learning.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Selenium and jsdom is crucial for choosing the right tool based on the specific requirements of your web development and testing projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Selenium, jsdom

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Selenium	jsdom
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.	It is a pure-JavaScript implementation of many web standards, notably the WHATWG DOM and HTML Standards, for use with Node.js. In general, the goal of the project is to emulate enough of a subset of a web browser to be useful for testing and scraping real-world web applications.
-	Canvas support;Encoding sniffing;Closing down a jsdom;Running jsdom inside a web browser;Debugging the DOM using Chrome Devtools
Statistics
GitHub Stars 33.6K	GitHub Stars 21.3K
GitHub Forks 8.6K	GitHub Forks 1.8K
Stacks 16.2K	Stacks 1.6K
Followers 12.6K	Followers 55
Votes 527	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers	Pros 1 Lightweight
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript Node.js Browserify HTML5

What are some alternatives to Selenium, jsdom?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

Selenium vs jsdom: What are the differences?

Introduction

Browser Interaction: Selenium is primarily used for automating interactions with real browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, allowing for a more realistic simulation of user behavior. On the other hand, jsdom is a lightweight, pure JavaScript implementation of the DOM that simulates a browser environment within Node.js, making it ideal for server-side testing and manipulation of DOM elements.
Support for Complex Browser Interactions: Selenium provides robust support for handling complex browser interactions, such as clicking on elements, filling out forms, and navigating through different pages. In contrast, jsdom has limitations when it comes to simulating certain browser behaviors like CSS rendering, layout calculations, and other client-specific features.
Performance: Selenium is typically slower due to its reliance on real browsers, which can lead to longer test execution times, especially when running numerous tests in parallel. Jsdom, being a lightweight library, has faster execution times and is more suitable for quick and simple DOM manipulations without the overhead of launching a full-fledged browser instance.
Testing Environments: Selenium is well-suited for end-to-end testing in a real browser environment, ensuring that the web application behaves as expected across different browsers. Jsdom, on the other hand, is more suitable for unit testing and integration testing within a Node.js environment, where a full browser runtime is not required.
Integration with Testing Frameworks: Selenium seamlessly integrates with popular testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, and Jest, providing a wide range of features for writing and executing test cases. Jsdom, being a JavaScript library, can be easily integrated with tools like Mocha and Jasmine for testing DOM manipulation and server-side logic.
Community and Support: Selenium has a vast community of developers and contributors that actively maintain and improve the tool, ensuring constant updates and support. Jsdom, while also popular, may have a smaller community in comparison, which could affect the availability of resources and documentation for troubleshooting and learning.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Selenium and jsdom is crucial for choosing the right tool based on the specific requirements of your web development and testing projects.

Selenium vs jsdom

Overview

Selenium vs jsdom: What are the differences?