Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jsonnet vs Liquid: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Jsonnet and Liquid, highlighting their key differences.
Data Structure Handling: Jsonnet is a data templating language that excels at transforming, calculating, and organizing data structures. It provides a rich set of operators and functions to manipulate data efficiently. On the other hand, Liquid is primarily designed for content management systems and focuses on basic data manipulation, such as filtering and iterating through collections.
Language Flexibility: Jsonnet has a more flexible and expressive language syntax with support for functions, objects, arrays, and conditionals. It also allows importing external JSON or Jsonnet files for modular composition. In contrast, Liquid has a simpler syntax tailored specifically for template rendering. While it supports basic logic and filters, it lacks more advanced language constructs.
System Interactions: Jsonnet supports executing system commands directly within the language, enabling interaction with the host system during template evaluation. This allows for dynamic generation of template content based on system information. On the other hand, Liquid focuses solely on rendering templates and does not provide direct system interaction capabilities.
Template Inheritance and Layout: Liquid has built-in support for template inheritance and layout, allowing a modular approach to constructing web pages. Templates can be extended and overridden via "blocks," providing a convenient way to reuse and organize templates. However, Jsonnet does not natively support template inheritance and layout. It is primarily used for data processing and is usually paired with other technologies, such as configuration management tools.
Community and Ecosystem: Liquid is widely used in popular content management systems like Shopify and Jekyll, which results in a larger community and a rich ecosystem of templates, themes, and plugins. Jsonnet, on the other hand, although gaining popularity in the infrastructure-as-code and configuration management domains, has a smaller community and a more focused ecosystem.
Tooling and Integration: Liquid has extensive tooling and integration options tailored for content management systems. It has plugins, integrations, and specific editors that provide a seamless development experience. Jsonnet, while it has some tooling support like code editors with syntax highlighting, linters, and formatters, does not have as many specialized tools and integrations as Liquid.
In summary, Jsonnet and Liquid differ in terms of their data structure handling capabilities, language flexibility, system interaction, template inheritance and layout support, community and ecosystem size, as well as tooling and integration options.
@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.
Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?
Thanks In Advance
I like Handlebars, it's very mature... some would say-- outdated.
Handlebars loops are done via {{#each myList}}. Read the docs! https://handlebarsjs.com/guide
Remember, don't put logic in your templates! Keep this layer simple. Sorry to hear you have to use dotNet.
Pros of Jsonnet
- Side-effect free1
- Data templating (not string templating)1
- Dashboard as a code0
