Octant vs k3s

Overview

k3s

Stacks97

Followers252

Votes16

Octant

Stacks11

Followers45

Votes2

Octant vs k3s: What are the differences?

Installation Process: Octant is a desktop application that needs to be installed on the user's machine, while k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution that can be easily installed on a server or other computing resource with minimal configurations.
Resource Consumption: Octant is more resource-intensive due to its graphical user interface and local server functionalities, whereas k3s is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments.
User Interface: Octant provides a rich and interactive graphical user interface for easier navigation and visualization of Kubernetes resources, while k3s primarily offers a command-line interface for managing and monitoring Kubernetes clusters, targeting more experienced users.
Feature Set: Octant focuses on providing a comprehensive toolset for developers and administrators to interact with Kubernetes resources, while k3s prioritizes simplicity and performance, stripping down unnecessary components to reduce complexities in management.
Community Support: Octant has a smaller user base and may have limited community support compared to k3s, which is backed by Rancher Labs and has a larger user community contributing to its development and maintenance.
Use Case: Octant is suitable for developers and users who prefer a visual approach to managing Kubernetes clusters, whereas k3s is well-suited for production environments and edge computing scenarios where lightweight deployments are crucial.

In Summary, Octant and k3s differ in terms of installation process, resource consumption, user interface, feature set, community support, and use case suitability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

k3s	Octant
Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.	A tool for developers to understand how applications run on a Kubernetes cluster. It aims to be part of the developer's toolkit for gaining insight and approaching complexity found in Kubernetes.
ARM64 and ARMv7 support; Simplified installation; SQLite3 support; etcd support; Automatic Manifest and Helm Chart management; containerd, CoreDNS, Flannel support	Resource Viewer; Summary View; Port Forward; Log Stream; Label Filter; Cluster Navigation; Plugin System
Statistics
Stacks 97	Stacks 11
Followers 252	Followers 45
Votes 16	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Lightweight 4 Easy 2 Replication Controller 2 Scale Services 2 Open Source	Pros 1 Open Source 1 Web-based and on compatible with common OS
Integrations
Kubernetes SQLite	gRPC Kubernetes Linux Windows macOS

What are some alternatives to k3s, Octant?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

Octant vs k3s: What are the differences?

Installation Process: Octant is a desktop application that needs to be installed on the user's machine, while k3s is a lightweight Kubernetes distribution that can be easily installed on a server or other computing resource with minimal configurations.
Resource Consumption: Octant is more resource-intensive due to its graphical user interface and local server functionalities, whereas k3s is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments.
User Interface: Octant provides a rich and interactive graphical user interface for easier navigation and visualization of Kubernetes resources, while k3s primarily offers a command-line interface for managing and monitoring Kubernetes clusters, targeting more experienced users.
Feature Set: Octant focuses on providing a comprehensive toolset for developers and administrators to interact with Kubernetes resources, while k3s prioritizes simplicity and performance, stripping down unnecessary components to reduce complexities in management.
Community Support: Octant has a smaller user base and may have limited community support compared to k3s, which is backed by Rancher Labs and has a larger user community contributing to its development and maintenance.
Use Case: Octant is suitable for developers and users who prefer a visual approach to managing Kubernetes clusters, whereas k3s is well-suited for production environments and edge computing scenarios where lightweight deployments are crucial.

In Summary, Octant and k3s differ in terms of installation process, resource consumption, user interface, feature set, community support, and use case suitability.

Octant vs k3s

Overview