StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Katalon Studio vs Watir

Katalon Studio vs Watir

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Watir
Watir
Stacks25
Followers38
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks248
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
Stacks152
Followers177
Votes0

Katalon Studio vs Watir: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Support for Different Languages: Katalon Studio allows users to write test scripts in Groovy, Java, and Python, while Watir supports Ruby as its primary scripting language. This difference provides users with more flexibility in choosing the language they are most comfortable with for test automation.

  2. Integration with Other Tools: Katalon Studio offers built-in integrations with popular Continuous Integration (CI) tools such as Jenkins and Bamboo, making it easier to incorporate test automation into a DevOps pipeline. On the other hand, Watir does not provide native integration with as many CI tools, requiring users to rely on additional plugins or configurations.

  3. Cross-Browser Testing Capabilities: Katalon Studio has robust support for executing tests across multiple browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, providing developers with the ability to ensure the compatibility of their applications. In comparison, Watir focuses mainly on automating tests on the Chrome and Firefox browsers, potentially limiting the scope of cross-browser testing.

  4. Object Identification Mechanism: Katalon Studio utilizes a keyword-driven testing approach where objects on the application under test are identified using a combination of XPath, CSS, and attributes. On the contrary, Watir follows a more direct approach by using simple and precise identification methods such as HTML element ID or class name.

  5. Community Support and Documentation: Katalon Studio has a large and active community that provides extensive support through forums, online resources, and documentation. In contrast, Watir's community is comparatively smaller, leading to potential challenges in finding help or resources when facing issues or seeking guidance.

  6. Pricing Model: Katalon Studio offers a free version with limited features along with paid plans that unlock advanced functionalities, while Watir is an open-source tool with no associated costs. This difference in pricing models may influence the choice of tool based on budget constraints and required features.


In Summary, Katalon Studio and Watir differ in terms of supported languages, integrations, cross-browser testing capabilities, object identification mechanisms, community support, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Watir
Watir
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio

Watir, pronounced water, is an open-source (BSD) family of Ruby libraries for automating web browsers. It allows you to write tests that are easy to read and maintain. It is simple and flexible. Watir drives browsers the same way people do. It clicks links, fills in forms, presses buttons. Watir also checks results, such as…

Katalon Studio is a free and robust automation solution for API, Web and Mobile testing. It integrates all necessary components with built-in keywords and project templates into a complete automation framework. Katalon Studio is easy-to-use for new users but still offers advanced capabilities for experienced users. The solution is trusted by an active community of over 150K users from 150+ countries around the world.

The test scripts are written in Ruby language; It supports multiple domains and has a test recorder; It can find elements by its name, index, ID or value.
Productive IDE for API automation; API testing centric; Built to work with modern frameworks; Sustainable and scalable platform; Minimal maintenance; Built-in project templates; Generate tests automatically; Powerful test execution mechanism; CI/CD readiness; Dynamic failure handling and automatic re-execution; Report and Debug; Test Maintenance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
248
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
25
Stacks
152
Followers
38
Followers
177
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Selenium
Selenium
Rails
Rails
Python
Python
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Travis CI
Travis CI
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
TestLink
TestLink
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Watir, Katalon Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana