Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Keycloak

709
1.3K
+ 1
102
LDAP

66
69
+ 1
0
Add tool

Keycloak vs LDAP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Keycloak and LDAP. Keycloak is an open-source software product that provides single sign-on (SSO) capabilities, while LDAP is a protocol used for accessing and maintaining distributed directory information services.

  1. Architecture: Keycloak follows a client-server architecture, where the server handles authentication, authorization, and user management. On the other hand, LDAP is a protocol that can be implemented by various directory servers, such as Microsoft Active Directory or OpenLDAP.

  2. User Management: Keycloak provides a user-friendly administrative console and REST APIs to manage users, roles, and permissions. It also supports features like self-registration and social logins. In contrast, LDAP requires administrators to have technical knowledge to manage users and groups using the LDAP directory server's administrative interface.

  3. Integration: Keycloak can integrate with various identity providers like Google, Facebook, or Active Directory, making it easier to use existing identity sources. LDAP, on the other hand, is a standalone protocol and does not have built-in support for integrating with external identity providers.

  4. Standard Compliance: Keycloak supports modern authentication protocols such as OpenID Connect and SAML. It is also compliant with security standards like OAuth 2.0 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). LDAP, on the other hand, is an older protocol that does not have native support for these modern authentication standards.

  5. Scalability and High Availability: Keycloak can be deployed in a cluster to provide high availability and scalability. It uses a distributed cache to share session state across the cluster. LDAP, on the other hand, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve high availability and scalability.

  6. Ease of Use: Keycloak provides a user-friendly interface for managing users, roles, and permissions. It also provides a comprehensive documentation that makes it easier for developers and administrators to understand and work with the system. LDAP, on the other hand, requires technical knowledge and may have a steeper learning curve.

In Summary, Keycloak provides a user-friendly, scalable, and standards-compliant solution for single sign-on, while LDAP is a protocol used for directory access and lacks some of the modern features and ease of use provided by Keycloak.

Advice on Keycloak and LDAP
Needs advice
on
KeycloakKeycloakOktaOkta
and
Spring SecuritySpring Security

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server. 1. Keycloak 2. Okta 3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.

See more
Replies (3)
Luca Ferrari
Solution Architect at Red Hat, Inc. · | 5 upvotes · 204.9K views
Recommends
on
KeycloakKeycloak

It isn't clear if beside the AuthZ requirement you had others, but given the scenario you described my suggestion would for you to go with Keycloak. First of all because you have already an onpremise IdP and with Keycloak you could maintain that setup (if privacy is a concern). Another important point is configuration and customization: I would assume with Spring OAuth you might have had some custom logic around authentication, this can be easily reconfigured in Keycloak by leveraging SPI (https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_development/index.html#_auth_spi). Finally AuthZ as a functionality is well developed, based on standard protocols and extensible on Keycloak (https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/authorization_services/)

See more
Sandor Racz
Recommends
on
KeycloakKeycloak

We have good experience using Keycloak for SSO with OIDC with our Spring Boot based applications. It's free, easy to install and configure, extensible - so I recommend it.

See more
Recommends
on
KeycloakKeycloak

You can also use Keycloak as an Identity Broker, which enables you to handle authentication on many different identity providers of your customers. With this setup, you are able to perform authorization tasks centralized.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Keycloak
Pros of LDAP
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
  • 6
    Maintained by devs at Redhat
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Keycloak
    Cons of LDAP
    • 7
      Okta
    • 6
      Poor client side documentation
    • 5
      Lack of Code examples for client side
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      No Stats

      What is Keycloak?

      It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

      What is LDAP?

      It is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Keycloak?
      What companies use LDAP?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Keycloak or LDAP.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Keycloak?
      What tools integrate with LDAP?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Keycloak and LDAP?
      Auth0
      A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
      Okta
      Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning.
      FreeIPA
      FreeIPA is an integrated Identity and Authentication solution for Linux/UNIX networked environments. A FreeIPA server provides centralized authentication, authorization and account information by storing data about user, groups, hosts and other objects necessary to manage the security aspects of a network of computers.
      Dex
      Dex is a personal CRM that helps you build stronger relationships. Remember where you left off, keep in touch, and be more thoughtful -- all in one place.
      Vault
      Vault is a tool for securely accessing secrets. A secret is anything that you want to tightly control access to, such as API keys, passwords, certificates, and more. Vault provides a unified interface to any secret, while providing tight access control and recording a detailed audit log.
      See all alternatives