Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Keycloak vs LDAP: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this markdown, we will discuss the key differences between Keycloak and LDAP. Keycloak is an open-source software product that provides single sign-on (SSO) capabilities, while LDAP is a protocol used for accessing and maintaining distributed directory information services.
Architecture: Keycloak follows a client-server architecture, where the server handles authentication, authorization, and user management. On the other hand, LDAP is a protocol that can be implemented by various directory servers, such as Microsoft Active Directory or OpenLDAP.
User Management: Keycloak provides a user-friendly administrative console and REST APIs to manage users, roles, and permissions. It also supports features like self-registration and social logins. In contrast, LDAP requires administrators to have technical knowledge to manage users and groups using the LDAP directory server's administrative interface.
Integration: Keycloak can integrate with various identity providers like Google, Facebook, or Active Directory, making it easier to use existing identity sources. LDAP, on the other hand, is a standalone protocol and does not have built-in support for integrating with external identity providers.
Standard Compliance: Keycloak supports modern authentication protocols such as OpenID Connect and SAML. It is also compliant with security standards like OAuth 2.0 and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). LDAP, on the other hand, is an older protocol that does not have native support for these modern authentication standards.
Scalability and High Availability: Keycloak can be deployed in a cluster to provide high availability and scalability. It uses a distributed cache to share session state across the cluster. LDAP, on the other hand, may require additional configuration and setup to achieve high availability and scalability.
Ease of Use: Keycloak provides a user-friendly interface for managing users, roles, and permissions. It also provides a comprehensive documentation that makes it easier for developers and administrators to understand and work with the system. LDAP, on the other hand, requires technical knowledge and may have a steeper learning curve.
In Summary, Keycloak provides a user-friendly, scalable, and standards-compliant solution for single sign-on, while LDAP is a protocol used for directory access and lacks some of the modern features and ease of use provided by Keycloak.
I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server. 1. Keycloak 2. Okta 3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
It isn't clear if beside the AuthZ requirement you had others, but given the scenario you described my suggestion would for you to go with Keycloak. First of all because you have already an onpremise IdP and with Keycloak you could maintain that setup (if privacy is a concern). Another important point is configuration and customization: I would assume with Spring OAuth you might have had some custom logic around authentication, this can be easily reconfigured in Keycloak by leveraging SPI (https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_development/index.html#_auth_spi). Finally AuthZ as a functionality is well developed, based on standard protocols and extensible on Keycloak (https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/authorization_services/)
We have good experience using Keycloak for SSO with OIDC with our Spring Boot based applications. It's free, easy to install and configure, extensible - so I recommend it.
You can also use Keycloak as an Identity Broker, which enables you to handle authentication on many different identity providers of your customers. With this setup, you are able to perform authorization tasks centralized.
Pros of Keycloak
- It's a open source solution33
- Supports multiple identity provider24
- OpenID and SAML support17
- Easy customisation12
- JSON web token10
- Maintained by devs at Redhat6
Pros of LDAP
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Keycloak
- Okta7
- Poor client side documentation6
- Lack of Code examples for client side5