Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Keycloak vs WSO2: What are the differences?
# Introduction
This Markdown code compares the key differences between Keycloak and WSO2, focusing on specific points to help users make informed decisions.
1. **User Management**: Keycloak provides a user-friendly interface for user management, making it easy to add, remove, and update users. On the other hand, WSO2 offers advanced user management features, such as user roles and permissions, providing more flexibility in setting up complex access control scenarios.
2. **Protocol Support**: Keycloak supports a wide range of protocols, including SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect, catering to different authentication and authorization requirements. In contrast, WSO2 supports various protocols with a focus on enterprise-grade security standards, ensuring compliance with industry regulations.
3. **Integration Capabilities**: Keycloak offers seamless integration with popular development frameworks and tools, simplifying the implementation process for developers. WSO2, on the other hand, provides extensive integration capabilities with enterprise systems, enabling seamless connectivity within complex IT environments.
4. **Scalability**: Keycloak is known for its scalability, allowing organizations to easily scale their authentication and authorization services based on their growing user base. WSO2, with its robust architecture, offers high scalability, ensuring consistent performance under heavy loads and demanding environments.
5. **Customization**: Keycloak provides a high level of customization options, allowing users to tailor the authentication and authorization processes to meet specific business requirements. WSO2 also offers extensive customization features, enabling users to adapt the platform to unique organizational needs effectively.
6. **Community Support**: Keycloak has a vibrant open-source community that actively contributes to the platform's development and provides valuable resources for users. Similarly, WSO2 also benefits from a strong community support system that offers expertise, guidance, and enhancements to users for seamless integration and adoption.
In Summary, this comparison highlights key differences between Keycloak and WSO2, emphasizing aspects such as user management, protocol support, integration capabilities, scalability, customization, and community support, to aid users in selecting the suitable identity and access management solution for their specific requirements.
I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server. 1. Keycloak 2. Okta 3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
It isn't clear if beside the AuthZ requirement you had others, but given the scenario you described my suggestion would for you to go with Keycloak. First of all because you have already an onpremise IdP and with Keycloak you could maintain that setup (if privacy is a concern). Another important point is configuration and customization: I would assume with Spring OAuth you might have had some custom logic around authentication, this can be easily reconfigured in Keycloak by leveraging SPI (https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_development/index.html#_auth_spi). Finally AuthZ as a functionality is well developed, based on standard protocols and extensible on Keycloak (https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/authorization_services/)
You can also use Keycloak as an Identity Broker, which enables you to handle authentication on many different identity providers of your customers. With this setup, you are able to perform authorization tasks centralized.
We have good experience using Keycloak for SSO with OIDC with our Spring Boot based applications. It's free, easy to install and configure, extensible - so I recommend it.
Pros of Keycloak
- It's a open source solution33
- Supports multiple identity provider24
- OpenID and SAML support17
- Easy customisation12
- JSON web token10
- Maintained by devs at Redhat6
Pros of WSO2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Keycloak
- Okta7
- Poor client side documentation6
- Lack of Code examples for client side5
