StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Keycloak vs WSO2

Keycloak vs WSO2

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WSO2
WSO2
Stacks84
Followers164
Votes0
GitHub Stars932
Forks862
Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks783
Followers1.3K
Votes102

Keycloak vs WSO2: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code compares the key differences between Keycloak and WSO2, focusing on specific points to help users make informed decisions.

1. **User Management**: Keycloak provides a user-friendly interface for user management, making it easy to add, remove, and update users. On the other hand, WSO2 offers advanced user management features, such as user roles and permissions, providing more flexibility in setting up complex access control scenarios.

2. **Protocol Support**: Keycloak supports a wide range of protocols, including SAML, OAuth, and OpenID Connect, catering to different authentication and authorization requirements. In contrast, WSO2 supports various protocols with a focus on enterprise-grade security standards, ensuring compliance with industry regulations.

3. **Integration Capabilities**: Keycloak offers seamless integration with popular development frameworks and tools, simplifying the implementation process for developers. WSO2, on the other hand, provides extensive integration capabilities with enterprise systems, enabling seamless connectivity within complex IT environments.

4. **Scalability**: Keycloak is known for its scalability, allowing organizations to easily scale their authentication and authorization services based on their growing user base. WSO2, with its robust architecture, offers high scalability, ensuring consistent performance under heavy loads and demanding environments.

5. **Customization**: Keycloak provides a high level of customization options, allowing users to tailor the authentication and authorization processes to meet specific business requirements. WSO2 also offers extensive customization features, enabling users to adapt the platform to unique organizational needs effectively.

6. **Community Support**: Keycloak has a vibrant open-source community that actively contributes to the platform's development and provides valuable resources for users. Similarly, WSO2 also benefits from a strong community support system that offers expertise, guidance, and enhancements to users for seamless integration and adoption.

In Summary, this comparison highlights key differences between Keycloak and WSO2, emphasizing aspects such as user management, protocol support, integration capabilities, scalability, customization, and community support, to aid users in selecting the suitable identity and access management solution for their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on WSO2, Keycloak

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

WSO2
WSO2
Keycloak
Keycloak

It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

100% Open Source;Largest Platform Built on Single Code Base;Cloud Enabled;Premium Support
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
932
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
862
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
84
Stacks
783
Followers
164
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
102
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
Integrations
Segment
Segment
Zapier
Zapier
Postman
Postman
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to WSO2, Keycloak?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope