StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. KeystoneJS vs Wagtail

KeystoneJS vs Wagtail

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS
Stacks69
Followers209
Votes27
Wagtail
Wagtail
Stacks163
Followers288
Votes132

KeystoneJS vs Wagtail: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: KeystoneJS is a headless CMS that provides a flexible GraphQL API for content management, while Wagtail is a full-stack CMS that integrates seamlessly with Django. KeystoneJS focuses on decoupling the front end from the back end, allowing developers to build custom front ends using any technology. In contrast, Wagtail is tightly integrated with Django's templating system, offering a more monolithic approach to web development.

  2. Content Modeling: KeystoneJS allows developers to define content models using its intuitive Admin UI or programmatically. It provides support for nested schemas and relationships between content types. On the other hand, Wagtail offers a hierarchical page model where content types are structured as pages with a parent-child hierarchy. This approach simplifies content organization and navigation within the CMS.

  3. User Interface: KeystoneJS provides a modern and customizable Admin UI powered by React components, allowing developers to tailor the interface to specific project requirements. Wagtail, on the other hand, offers a more traditional Django Admin UI with additional features specifically designed for managing rich media and structured content.

  4. Extensibility: In terms of extensibility, KeystoneJS allows developers to create custom plugins and extend its functionality easily using its powerful API. Wagtail also offers a robust system for creating custom page types, snippets, and plugins, but its extensibility is mainly focused on enhancing content management capabilities within the Django framework.

  5. Community Support: KeystoneJS has a vibrant community of developers contributing plugins, tutorials, and support on platforms like GitHub and Stack Overflow. Wagtail, being built on top of Django, leverages the existing Django community for support and resources, making it easier to find solutions to common development challenges.

  6. Hosting and Deployment: KeystoneJS can be deployed on various hosting platforms, including cloud services like Heroku, AWS, and DigitalOcean. Wagtail, being tightly integrated with Django, is typically deployed alongside Django applications on servers compatible with Django's deployment requirements, providing a more consistent hosting and deployment experience.

In Summary, KeystoneJS and Wagtail differ in their architecture, content modeling approach, user interface design, extensibility options, community support, and hosting/deployment capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KeystoneJS
KeystoneJS
Wagtail
Wagtail

Keystone is the easiest way to build database-driven websites, applications and APIs in Node.js.

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

Express.js and MongoDB;Dynamic Routes;Database Fields;Auto-generated Admin UI;Simpler Code;Form Processing;Session Management;Email Sending
A fast, attractive editor interface;Complete control over design with standard Django templates;Configure content types through standard Django models;Tightly integrated search (with an Elasticsearch backend for production);Strong document and image management;Wide support for embedded content;Simple, configurable permissions;Support for tree-based content organisation;Optional preview->submit->approve workflow;Fast out of the box. Varnish-friendly if you need it;A simple form builder;Optional static site generation;Excellent test coverage
Statistics
Stacks
69
Stacks
163
Followers
209
Followers
288
Votes
27
Votes
132
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Out-of-box tools and basic services
  • 3
    Large community
  • 2
    Great sandbox to play with nodejs
  • 2
    Great CMS and API platform
  • 2
    Great schema-based auto-generated admin interface
Pros
  • 23
    Highly customizable
  • 18
    Very Flexible
  • 18
    StreamFields are amazing
  • 15
    Web content management
  • 13
    Non-tech colleagues can update website content
Cons
  • 3
    Not a full CMS: basic components require heavy coding
  • 2
    Small developer community
  • 1
    Expensive to develop
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to KeystoneJS, Wagtail?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack