Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Knative vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Knative and Kubernetes
Knative and Kubernetes are both popular open-source platforms used for managing containerized applications and services. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two platforms that set them apart.
Abstraction Level: Kubernetes is a container orchestration platform that provides a robust infrastructure for managing and scaling containerized applications. It focuses on providing a scalable and reliable infrastructure layer for containers, allowing developers to deploy, manage, and scale applications. On the other hand, Knative is built on top of Kubernetes and adds a higher-level abstraction specifically for serverless workloads. Knative abstracts away the infrastructure concerns and provides developers with a serverless experience, enabling them to focus solely on writing code without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
Serverless Support: One of the key differences between Knative and Kubernetes is their support for serverless computing. While Kubernetes can run serverless workloads using custom configurations or external tools like Kubeless or OpenFaaS, Knative is specifically designed for serverless applications. Knative provides a set of building blocks for event-driven, auto-scaling, and managed container workloads, making it easier to develop, deploy, and manage serverless applications.
Auto-scaling and Event-driven Scaling: Knative offers built-in auto-scaling capabilities for serverless workloads. It can automatically scale up or down based on the incoming traffic or events. This makes Knative well-suited for handling variable workloads and bursty traffic patterns. In contrast, while Kubernetes also has auto-scaling capabilities, it requires additional setup and configuration to achieve the same level of auto-scaling and event-driven scaling as offered by Knative.
Workload Abstraction and Portability: Kubernetes provides a generic platform for managing containerized workloads and has a highly flexible and extensible architecture. It allows running various types of workloads, including stateful and stateless applications and provides a wide range of options for customization and portability. Knative, on the other hand, focuses specifically on serverless workloads and provides a higher-level abstraction for building serverless applications. While Knative uses Kubernetes under the hood, its abstraction is more tailored towards serverless use cases and provides additional abstractions and APIs specifically for serverless development.
Ease of Use and Developer Experience: Kubernetes can have a steep learning curve, especially for developers new to container orchestration. It requires understanding various concepts, such as pods, services, deployments, and networking, to effectively deploy and manage applications. Knative, being a higher-level abstraction built on top of Kubernetes, provides a simpler and more intuitive developer experience for serverless workloads. It offers a higher-level API and abstracts away most of the infrastructure concerns, allowing developers to focus more on writing code and less on managing infrastructure.
Community and Maturity: Kubernetes has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and ecosystem compared to Knative. It has become the de facto standard for container orchestration and has widespread adoption in the industry. Knative, being a relatively newer project, has a smaller but growing community. While it is gaining popularity, it may not have the same breadth of community-contributed tools and integrations as Kubernetes.
In summary, Knative provides a higher-level abstraction for serverless workloads on top of Kubernetes, offering built-in serverless support, auto-scaling capabilities, simplified developer experience, and tailored abstractions for serverless development. Kubernetes, on the other hand, provides a more generic platform for managing containerized workloads with a larger community and ecosystem.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Knative
- Portability5
- Autoscaling4
- Open source3
- Eventing3
- Secure Eventing3
- On top of Kubernetes3
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Knative
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1