Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

3scale

51
92
+ 1
16
Kong

642
1.5K
+ 1
139
Add tool

3scale vs Kong: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between 3scale and Kong

Introduction

In the world of API management, both 3scale and Kong are popular choices. However, there are some key differences between the two that can help you make an informed decision based on your specific requirements.

  1. Deployment Model: 3scale is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solution, meaning it is hosted and managed by the vendor. On the other hand, Kong is available as open-source software which can be self-hosted or deployed in the cloud. This difference gives you more control and flexibility over your infrastructure with Kong.

  2. Pricing and Licensing: 3scale follows a subscription-based pricing model, often charging based on the number of requests or the features required. Kong, as open-source software, is free to use, but for additional features and support, Kong Enterprise can be purchased. This difference in pricing and licensing can be a significant factor depending on your budget and specific needs.

  3. Customizability and Extensibility: Kong, being an open-source solution, allows for extensive customizability and extensibility. You can modify the code, add plugins, and tailor the solution to your requirements. On the other hand, while 3scale does offer some customization options, they are more limited compared to Kong. This difference can be crucial if your organization requires more flexibility and control over the API gateway.

  4. Developer Experience: 3scale provides a developer portal out-of-the-box, allowing you to document, publish, and manage your APIs efficiently. Kong, on the other hand, does not include a developer portal. However, Kong integrates well with other API management solutions and can be seamlessly connected with existing developer portals. This difference may be considered if having a built-in developer portal is a priority for your organization.

  5. Community and Support: Kong benefits from a strong open-source community, which means that you can get extensive support from the community forums, documentation, and plugins developed by the community. 3scale, being a SaaS solution, comes with dedicated technical support provided by the vendor. Depending on your preference and requirements, this difference in support options can be a deciding factor.

  6. Security Features: Both 3scale and Kong offer various security features such as rate limiting, authentication, and JWT validation. However, Kong also provides plugins for additional security measures like Web Application Firewall (WAF) and Bot detection. This difference in security features can be significant if your organization requires advanced security capabilities.

In Summary, the key differences between 3scale and Kong lie in the deployment model, pricing/licensing, customizability/extensibility, developer experience, community/support, and security features. These differences can help you choose the API management solution that best fits your specific requirements.

Decisions about 3scale and Kong
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 309.3K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of 3scale
Pros of Kong
  • 6
    Integrated developer portal
  • 4
    Full lifecycle api management
  • 3
    Plugable api management layer
  • 3
    Separates policy definition from enforcement
  • 37
    Easy to maintain
  • 32
    Easy to install
  • 26
    Flexible
  • 21
    Great performance
  • 7
    Api blueprint
  • 4
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Kubernetes-native
  • 2
    Security
  • 2
    Has a good plugin infrastructure
  • 2
    Agnostic
  • 1
    Load balancing
  • 1
    Documentation is clear
  • 1
    Very customizable

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is 3scale?

3scale's API Management platform provides services and solutions, allowing you to Operate, Manage and Distribute your APIs. Trusted by 450+ API programs.

What is Kong?

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use 3scale?
What companies use Kong?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with 3scale?
What tools integrate with Kong?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubPythonNode.js+26
    29
    16120
    What are some alternatives to 3scale and Kong?
    Mashery
    Sign In and discover new APIs from our open data commons of RESTful APIs. Mashery's API management offerings include strategic consulting & developer support to help you build your business.
    Apiman
    It provides an easy way for API/service providers to use a web UI to define service contracts for their APIs, apply these contracts across multiple APIs, and control role-based user access and API versioning.
    Apigee
    API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
    Istio
    Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
    WSO2
    It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.
    See all alternatives