StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. KrakenD vs Mmock

KrakenD vs Mmock

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9
Mmock
Mmock
Stacks2
Followers2
Votes0
GitHub Stars686
Forks85

KrakenD vs Mmock: What are the differences?

Introduction:

1. Integration with microservices architecture: KrakenD is specifically designed to integrate with microservices architecture, providing a scalable solution for managing multiple microservices endpoints efficiently.

2. Protocol support: KrakenD supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, gRPC, WebSockets, and others, making it versatile and suitable for various use cases.

3. Middleware support: KrakenD offers a comprehensive set of middleware options for request processing, including authentication, logging, rate limiting, and more, enhancing its flexibility and adaptability to different requirements.

4. Open-source vs. commercial: KrakenD is an open-source API Gateway solution, while Mmock is primarily a commercial service, catering to different needs and preferences in terms of licensing and support options.

5. Response customization: KrakenD provides extensive capabilities for customizing API responses, enabling users to tailor responses to specific requirements and improve the overall user experience.

6. Ease of deployment: KrakenD is known for its ease of deployment and configuration, simplifying the process of setting up and managing API Gateway solutions effectively.

In Summary, KrakenD and Mmock differ in terms of their integration with microservices architecture, protocol support, middleware options, licensing, response customization, and deployment simplicity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KrakenD
KrakenD
Mmock
Mmock

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

It is a tool for tests easily and frequently without dependencies. Decoupe your project tests from your external APIs or from your still work in progress backend. Don't get stuck and invest the time where really matters instead of complex mocks, or stubs for your API dependencies.

Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Easy mock definition via JSON or YAML; Variables in response (fake or request data); Route patterns may include named parameters (/hello/:name); Glob matching ( * hello * ); Match request by method, URL params, query string, headers, cookies and bodies.; Mock definitions hot replace (edit your mocks without restart); Web interface to view requests data (method,path,headers,cookies,body,etc..); Stateful behaviour with scenarios; Verifying; Proxy mode; Fine grain log info in web interface; Real-time updates using WebSockets; Priority matching; Crazy mode for failure testing; Public interface auto discover; Lightweight and portable; No installation required
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
686
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
85
Stacks
59
Stacks
2
Followers
158
Followers
2
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easy to install
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to KrakenD, Mmock?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope