StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. KrakenD vs Pactflow

KrakenD vs Pactflow

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9
Pactflow
Pactflow
Stacks8
Followers22
Votes0

KrakenD vs Pactflow: What are the differences?

  1. Integration with API Gateway: KrakenD primarily serves as an API Gateway, handling all API requests and routing them to the appropriate backend services, while Pactflow focuses on API contract testing and validation, ensuring that APIs comply with specified contracts and meet expectations.
  2. Focus on API Contract Testing: Pactflow emphasizes API contract testing, enabling teams to define and share contracts between consumers and providers, validate API interactions, and ensure that services adhere to the specified contracts, promoting reliable and consistent APIs.
  3. Role in DevOps Lifecycle: KrakenD plays a crucial role in distributing traffic, caching responses, and enforcing API policies for backend services, enhancing performance and security, whereas Pactflow contributes to the DevOps lifecycle by promoting collaboration between teams, facilitating continuous integration and delivery, and ensuring API reliability through contract testing.
  4. Scalability and Performance Optimization: KrakenD is designed for scalability and performance optimization, leveraging features like load balancing, circuit breakers, and rate limiting to handle high traffic volumes efficiently, whereas Pactflow focuses on ensuring the integrity of API contracts and validating API interactions, prioritizing reliability and consistency over scalability.
  5. Tool Ecosystem Compatibility: KrakenD integrates seamlessly with various tools and technologies commonly used in the API management landscape, offering flexibility and compatibility with existing ecosystems, while Pactflow complements CI/CD pipelines by automating API contract testing and validation, enabling easy integration with popular testing frameworks and tools.
  6. Management of API Versions: KrakenD provides features for managing API versions and routing requests to specific versions based on consumer needs, allowing for smooth upgrades and deprecations, whereas Pactflow helps in maintaining API backward compatibility by allowing teams to test for potential breaking changes and ensuring smooth transitions between versions.

In Summary, KrakenD focuses on API gateway services and performance optimization, while Pactflow specializes in API contract testing and validation, playing crucial roles in ensuring reliable and consistent APIs within the DevOps lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

KrakenD
KrakenD
Pactflow
Pactflow

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

Deploy into production with impunity, and have visibility into the integration of your stack. It ensures that all components are communicating correctly before a release, without costly and brittle integration tests. We integrate with Pact and Spring Cloud Contract, enabling powerful collaboration features for the enterprise.

Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Integration: Integrates with Pact and Spring Cloud Contract contract testing frameworks; Webhook management: integrate Webhooks to orchestrate a CI/CD pipeline; SSO: Login with Google, Github or an OIDC/SAML provider; Verification results: Get instant feedback on failed tests and pinpoint which API interaction failed; Secrets management: store encrypted values for use in Webhooks; Auditing: integrate into your SOC through our Audit API
Statistics
Stacks
59
Stacks
8
Followers
158
Followers
22
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easy to install
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
GitHub
GitHub
Spring Cloud
Spring Cloud

What are some alternatives to KrakenD, Pactflow?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope