Azure Functions vs Kubernetes

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Functions

665
691
+ 1
62
Kubernetes

58.5K
50.6K
+ 1
677
Add tool

Azure Functions vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?

Azure Functions and Kubernetes are both popular cloud computing platforms used for deploying and managing applications. Here are the key differences between the two.

  1. Container Orchestration: Kubernetes is primarily a container orchestration platform that allows developers to manage and run containerized applications across a cluster of nodes. It provides advanced features like auto-scaling, load balancing, and deployment management. Azure Functions, on the other hand, is a serverless compute service. It allows developers to write and deploy functions without worrying about infrastructure management or scaling.

  2. Deployment Model: In Kubernetes, applications are typically deployed as containerized workloads, where each application component runs within its own container. Azure Functions, on the other hand, deploys functions as individual units of code. Each function is executed in response to an event trigger or an HTTP request.

  3. Scaling: Kubernetes enables horizontal scalability by allowing developers to spin up additional pods or nodes to handle increased workloads. It supports autoscaling based on resource utilization or custom metrics. Azure Functions also support autoscaling, but it scales at a function level. Each function can be independently scaled to handle varying workloads.

  4. Serverless Computing: Azure Functions is designed around the concept of serverless computing. It abstracts away the underlying infrastructure and only charges for the actual resource consumption. Kubernetes, on the other hand, requires developers to provision and manage the infrastructure for their applications.

  5. Development Experience: Kubernetes requires more upfront configuration and setup compared to Azure Functions. Developers have to define deployment manifests, services, and other resources to deploy applications. Azure Functions, being a serverless service, provides a simpler development experience. Developers can focus on writing the code for individual functions without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.

  6. Managed Services: Azure Functions is a fully managed service provided by Microsoft. It handles the management of infrastructure, scaling, and high availability automatically. On the other hand, Kubernetes can be self-hosted or managed by a cloud provider. The level of management and support may vary depending on the chosen deployment model.

In summary, Azure Functions is ideal for serverless computing scenarios, while Kubernetes provides advanced capabilities for container orchestration and management.

Decisions about Azure Functions and Kubernetes
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Azure Functions
Pros of Kubernetes
  • 14
    Pay only when invoked
  • 11
    Great developer experience for C#
  • 9
    Multiple languages supported
  • 7
    Great debugging support
  • 5
    Can be used as lightweight https service
  • 4
    Easy scalability
  • 3
    WebHooks
  • 3
    Costo
  • 2
    Event driven
  • 2
    Azure component events for Storage, services etc
  • 2
    Poor developer experience for C#
  • 164
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 128
    Simple and powerful
  • 106
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 25
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 8
    Simple
  • 6
    Self-healing
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 2
    Sfg
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Expandable

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Azure Functions
Cons of Kubernetes
  • 1
    No persistent (writable) file system available
  • 1
    Poor support for Linux environments
  • 1
    Sporadic server & language runtime issues
  • 1
    Not suited for long-running applications
  • 16
    Steep learning curve
  • 15
    Poor workflow for development
  • 8
    Orchestrates only infrastructure
  • 4
    High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
  • 2
    Too heavy for simple systems
  • 1
    Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
  • 1
    More moving parts to secure
  • 1
    Additional Technology Overhead

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Azure Functions?

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

What is Kubernetes?

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Azure Functions?
What companies use Kubernetes?
See which teams inside your own company are using Azure Functions or Kubernetes.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Azure Functions?
What tools integrate with Kubernetes?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Kubernetesetcd+2
2
1160
Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

DigitalOcean

GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
2
2356
PythonDockerKubernetes+7
3
1102
May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

Rancher Labs

KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
5
1496
Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

Rancher Labs

KubernetesRancher+2
2
937
What are some alternatives to Azure Functions and Kubernetes?
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.
Serverless
Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.
Google Cloud Functions
Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running
Cloud Functions for Firebase
Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.
Apex
Apex is a small tool for deploying and managing AWS Lambda functions. With shims for languages not yet supported by Lambda, you can use Golang out of the box.
See all alternatives