Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Dokku vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Automation and Orchestration: Dokku is a simple, lightweight platform that focuses on automating the deployment process by using a simple command-line interface. It is primarily designed for small to medium-sized projects and provides basic deployment and scaling functionalities. In contrast, Kubernetes is a powerful container orchestration platform that offers advanced automation and orchestration capabilities. It enables the management of large-scale containerized applications, automatic scaling, and high availability, making it suitable for complex and scalable projects.
Infrastructure Complexity: Dokku is relatively easy to set up and use as it runs directly on a single server. It simplifies the deployment process by abstracting away the complexity of infrastructure management. On the other hand, Kubernetes is designed to operate on a cluster of multiple servers, which leads to a higher level of complexity. It requires additional infrastructure components like a load balancer and a distributed file system, making it better suited for enterprise-grade applications with more complex infrastructure requirements.
Supported Environments: Dokku is specifically built for deploying applications on a single server, making it suitable for small projects or personal use. It is compatible with popular hosting providers and can be easily set up on a virtual private server. Conversely, Kubernetes is designed to scale and orchestrate applications across multiple servers or clusters, making it a better choice for large-scale production environments. It supports various cloud providers and can be deployed on-premises or in a hybrid cloud setup.
Customizability and Extensibility: Dokku is lightweight and focuses on simplicity, which limits its customization options. It provides a minimal set of features to deploy applications quickly but lacks advanced customizability. In contrast, Kubernetes is highly extensible and customizable. It offers a robust API and includes a wide range of features like service discovery, load balancing, and rolling updates. Kubernetes also provides a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions that can be used to enhance its functionality based on specific needs.
Community and Support: Dokku has a smaller community compared to Kubernetes. While it has an active community that provides updates and support, the resources and community-driven contributions are not as extensive as Kubernetes. Kubernetes, being an open-source platform developed by Google, has a large and vibrant community. It receives frequent updates and benefits from the contributions of many developers and companies. The extensive community support ensures a more stable and well-maintained platform.
Learning Curve and Complexity: Dokku has a relatively low learning curve and is easy to set up and use for small projects. It provides a straightforward deployment workflow and requires minimal configuration. On the other hand, Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and complex architecture. It requires a deeper understanding of containerization, networking, and distributed systems. Setting up and managing a Kubernetes cluster involves more configuration and administrative tasks, making it better suited for experienced DevOps teams.
In Summary, Dokku is a lightweight and simple deployment platform suited for small projects, while Kubernetes is a powerful container orchestration platform designed for large-scale, complex applications with advanced automation and customization options.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Dokku
- Simple23
- Open Source12
- Built on Docker11
- Free11
- Yay, it works like a charm4
- Git deploy4
- HTTP proxy from public hostname to container IP address2
- Zero downtime deploys2
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Dokku
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1