StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Kustomize vs Rancher

Kustomize vs Rancher

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644
Kustomize
Kustomize
Stacks73
Followers37
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.8K
Forks2.3K

Kustomize vs Rancher: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Kustomize and Rancher

  1. Purpose: Kustomize is a standalone tool for customizing Kubernetes configurations without the need for templating or code generation, while Rancher is a complete container management platform that includes Kubernetes distribution and additional features like monitoring, networking, and security.

  2. Scope: Kustomize focuses on managing Kubernetes manifest files and applying overlays for configuration management, while Rancher offers a broader set of functionalities including cluster provisioning, application deployment, infrastructure monitoring, and centralized management of multiple clusters.

  3. Extensibility: Kustomize provides limited extensibility through plugins and transformers, whereas Rancher allows users to integrate additional tools and services through its extensive plugin ecosystem and APIs.

  4. Ease of Use: Kustomize is more suitable for small to medium-scale projects due to its simplicity and lightweight nature, while Rancher is designed for enterprise-level deployments with complex requirements and scalability needs.

  5. Community Support: Kustomize has a growing but relatively small user community focused on Kubernetes configuration management, while Rancher benefits from a large and active community that contributes to the development of new features, plugins, and support resources.

  6. Vendor Lock-in: Kustomize is an open-source project maintained by the Kubernetes community, ensuring vendor neutrality and compatibility with any Kubernetes environment, whereas Rancher is a proprietary platform with enterprise support and additional features that may lock users into the Rancher ecosystem.

In Summary, Kustomize and Rancher differ in terms of their purpose, scope, extensibility, ease of use, community support, and vendor lock-in, catering to different needs and preferences in the container management space.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rancher
Rancher
Kustomize
Kustomize

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

It introduces a template-free way to customize application configuration that simplifies the use of off-the-shelf applications. Now, built into kubectl as apply -k.

Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
Purely declarative approach to configuration customization; Natively built into kubectl; Manage an arbitrary number of distinctly customized Kubernetes configurations; Available as a standalone binary for extension and integration into other services; Every artifact that kustomize uses is plain YAML and can be validated and processed as such
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
952
Stacks
73
Followers
1.5K
Followers
37
Votes
644
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Argo
Argo
Kubestack
Kubestack

What are some alternatives to Rancher, Kustomize?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana