StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Deployment As A Service
  5. LaunchDarkly vs Octopus Deploy

LaunchDarkly vs Octopus Deploy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118
LaunchDarkly
LaunchDarkly
Stacks322
Followers309
Votes6

LaunchDarkly vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison of LaunchDarkly and Octopus Deploy, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Deployment Automation: LaunchDarkly is primarily a feature management platform that allows users to manage and control the release of software features. It focuses on feature flagging and enables easy toggling of features on and off without the need for deployments. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy is a deployment automation tool that streamlines the process of deploying applications to various environments, ensuring consistent and error-free deployments.

  2. Release Management: LaunchDarkly focuses on controlling feature releases and managing feature flags, which allows for incremental rollouts, A/B testing, and rollbacks. It provides fine-grained controls and targeting options to gradually release features to specific users or groups. In contrast, Octopus Deploy specializes in deploying and managing applications throughout the entire software development lifecycle, including infrastructure provisioning, deployment orchestration, and release management.

  3. Version Control Integration: Octopus Deploy integrates well with popular version control systems like Git, enabling seamless deployment workflows. It can automatically trigger deployments based on commits or tags in the version control system. Although LaunchDarkly does not have direct version control integration, it can be integrated with deployment pipelines to control feature releases within the deployment process.

  4. Target Audience: LaunchDarkly mainly caters to development teams and product managers who focus on feature management and controlled releases. It provides tools to experiment with new features, gather feedback, and make data-driven decisions. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, primarily targets operations teams and developers responsible for deploying and managing applications, emphasizing automation, consistency, and reliability in the deployment process.

  5. Deployment Scenarios: LaunchDarkly is commonly used for feature flagging and gradual feature releases in live environments, allowing teams to test and gather feedback before fully rolling out features. It provides a way to separate feature rollout from deployment, minimizing risks. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, excels in orchestrating deployments across various environments, including staging, testing, and production, ensuring consistent and controlled deployments in complex application deployment scenarios.

  6. Infrastructure Provisioning: Octopus Deploy offers functionality to provision infrastructure resources for deployments, integrating with infrastructure-as-code tools like Terraform and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. It enables automated infrastructure provisioning along with application deployments. LaunchDarkly does not provide built-in infrastructure provisioning capabilities as its primary focus lies in feature management and controlled feature releases.

In summary, LaunchDarkly specializes in feature management and controlled releases, targeting development teams and product managers. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy focuses on deployment automation, release management, and infrastructure provisioning, catering to operations teams and developers responsible for the deployment lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
LaunchDarkly
LaunchDarkly

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Serving over 200 billion feature flags daily to help software teams build better software, faster. LaunchDarkly helps eliminate risk for developers and operations teams from the software development cycle.

Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Create custom environments;Team management;Create goals;Target or exclude user segments;New Relic integration;Optimizely integration;Audit logging;Custom roles and permissions
Statistics
Stacks
407
Stacks
322
Followers
493
Followers
309
Votes
118
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
  • 2
    Management of Config
Pros
  • 6
    Easy to use UI
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Octopus Deploy, LaunchDarkly?

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy

AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.

Distelli

Distelli

Build, test, and deploy your code from GitHub and BitBucket (or no repository at all) to any server in the world regardless of provider. Distelli customers iterate and ship faster with complete transparency.

ConfigCat

ConfigCat

Cross-platform feature flag service for Teams. It is a hosted or on-premise service with a web app for feature management, and SDKs for all major programming languages and technologies.

Unleash Hosted

Unleash Hosted

It is a simple feature management system. It gives you great overview of all feature toggles across all your applications. You decide who is exposed to which feature.

Airship

Airship

Airship is a modern product flagging framework that gives the right people total control over what your customers see & experience - without deploying code.

Launchdeck

Launchdeck

Deploy code from git to your server the fast and easy way. Launchdeck is our answer to the complicated process of deployment. It’s an automated deployment tool with a super-clear user interface and various smart features.

Laravel Forge

Laravel Forge

Provision, host, and deploy PHP applications on AWS, DigitalOcean, and Linode.

Flagr

Flagr

Open-source Go microservice supports feature flagging, A/B testing, and dynamic configuration. Logs data records and impressions.

Split

Split

Feature flags as a service for data-driven teams: Split automatically tracks changes to key metrics during every feature rollout. Split serves billions of impressions, helping organizations of all sizes to rapidly turn ideas into products.

ElasticBox

ElasticBox

Configure and deploy applications using CM tools like Docker, Chef, and Puppet. Your application is fully mobile across all major cloud environments because it’s decoupled from underlying cloud infrastructure.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana