StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. LDAP vs OpenID Connect

LDAP vs OpenID Connect

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect
Stacks233
Followers133
Votes0
LDAP
LDAP
Stacks76
Followers70
Votes0

LDAP vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?

LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) and OpenID Connect are both protocols that are used for authentication and authorization purposes in web applications. While they have some similarities, there are also key differences between them.

  1. Authentication and Authorization: LDAP is primarily a protocol for accessing and managing directory services, which includes authentication and authorization capabilities. It is designed for centralized authentication and storing user credentials and attributes. On the other hand, OpenID Connect is an authentication protocol that is built on top of OAuth 2.0. It is more focused on authentication and identity management, providing a framework for users to authenticate and authorize access to their identity information.

  2. Scope of Usage: LDAP is commonly used in enterprise environments where there is a need for centralized user authentication and access control. It is widely used in systems like Active Directory for managing user accounts, roles, and access to resources. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, is more commonly used in web applications where there is a need for federated identity management. It provides users with the ability to authenticate using their existing social media or email accounts, without having to create new credentials for each application.

  3. Protocols and Standards: LDAP is a protocol that operates on the client-server model, using specific commands and messages for communicating with directory servers. It is based on the X.500 standard and uses the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol Data Interchange Format (LDAP DIF) for exchanging data. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, is based on HTTP, JSON, and JWT (JSON Web Tokens). It leverages OAuth 2.0 for handling authentication and authorization flows.

  4. Token-based Authentication: LDAP uses a simple username and password mechanism for authentication, where the user credentials are compared with the stored values in the directory server. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, uses tokens for authentication. When a user authenticates using OpenID Connect, they receive an ID token that contains their identity information. This token can be used to authenticate subsequent requests to protected resources.

  5. User Experience: LDAP is typically used with a dedicated LDAP client application or integrated into enterprise applications. It often requires users to manually enter their username and password for authentication. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, provides a more seamless user experience by allowing users to authenticate using their existing social media or email accounts. It leverages Single Sign-On (SSO) capabilities, reducing the need for users to maintain multiple sets of credentials.

  6. Security and Federation: LDAP provides security features like transport encryption (LDAP over SSL/TLS) and authentication mechanisms like Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL). However, it does not provide built-in federation capabilities. OpenID Connect, on the other hand, leverages OAuth 2.0 for secure authentication and authorization and provides federation capabilities through its use of JSON Web Tokens (JWT). It allows users to authenticate with one party and then use those credentials to access resources from other participating parties.

In summary, LDAP is primarily used for centralized authentication and access control in enterprise environments, while OpenID Connect is a protocol for federated identity management in web applications, providing a seamless user experience and secure authentication using tokens.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect
LDAP
LDAP

It is a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. It allows Clients to verify the identity of the End-User based on the authentication performed by an Authorization Server, as well as to obtain basic profile information about the End-User in an interoperable and REST-like manner.

It is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications.

-
Lightweight directory access protocol; Used for authentication and storing information; General-purpose data store
Statistics
Stacks
233
Stacks
76
Followers
133
Followers
70
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Spring Security
Spring Security
OAuth2
OAuth2
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to OpenID Connect, LDAP?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope